arXiv:2409.00275cs.CLcs.SD2024-09被引 14

发现英语长元音的动态变化本质,揭示其与双元音无明确界限。

Towards a dynamical model of English vowels. Evidence from diphthongisation

  • 从发音动作角度分析六名讲北部英式英语者的数据
  • 所有长元音都具双重发音目标,双元音与长单元音无质的区别
  • 适合研究语音演变或语音动态建模的学者

双元音具有内在动态变化特征,其程度在共时和历时层面均可变化,导致双元音可能演变为单元音,反之亦然。建模此类变化需明确定义双元音与单元音的界限,但在声学和发音学上这一定义一直难以实现,因双元音化常呈渐变。本研究考察双元音是否在发音层面构成一个连贯的语音类别。基于六名北部英式英语使用者的发音动作数据和声学数据,分析多个双元音化度量指标,结果表明双元音与长单元音并无类别区分。我们提出一种基于发音音位学/任务动力学的模型,认为双元音和长单元音共享同一发音动作表征:均含两个发音目标,但差异在于动作的约束程度和组成部分的位置。该双目标表征也得到音系权重、历史双元音化及当代英式英语中的动态元音变异的支持。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Diphthong vowels exhibit a degree of inherent dynamic change, the extent of which can vary synchronically and diachronically, such that diphthong vowels can become monophthongs and vice versa. Modelling this type of change requires defining diphthongs in opposition to monophthongs. However, formulating an explicit definition has proven elusive in acoustics and articulation, as diphthongisation is often gradient in these domains. In this study, we consider whether diphthong vowels form a coherent phonetic category from the articulatory point of view. We present articulometry and acoustic data from six speakers of Northern Anglo-English producing a full set of phonologically long vowels. We analyse several measures of diphthongisation, all of which suggest that diphthongs are not categorically distinct from long monophthongs. We account for this observation with an Articulatory Phonology/Task Dynamic model in which diphthongs and long monophthongs have a common gestural representation, comprising two articulatory targets in each case, but they differ according to gestural constriction and location of the component gestures. We argue that a two-target representation for all long vowels is independently supported by phonological weight, as well as by the nature of historical diphthongisation and present-day dynamic vowel variation in British English.

语音学元音动态发音动作

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。