arXiv:2409.01885cs.SDcs.LG2024-09被引 2

利用机器运行状态信息,从干扰噪声中分离异常声音并精准检测。

Activity-Guided Industrial Anomalous Sound Detection against Interferences

  • 用机器运行状态引导声源分离,解决相似音色干扰难题。
  • 在仅含污染信号和状态信息下,达到与干净信号相当的检测精度。
  • 适合工业场景中存在复杂背景噪声的异常声音检测任务。

针对工业声音数据中的异常检测问题,本文提出一种实际场景下的解决方案:目标机器的声音常被背景噪声及邻近设备的干扰所污染。由于干扰与目标声音在音色上难以区分,传统方法难以应对。为此,我们提出SSAD框架,包含两部分:(i) 基于机器活动信息的声源分离(activity-informed SS),即使在干扰音色相近时仍能有效分离;(ii) 两步掩码机制,通过强调与机器活动一致的异常信号来增强检测鲁棒性。实验表明,尽管仅提供污染信号和活动信息,SSAD性能与拥有完整清洁信号基线相当。尤其在存在干扰的情况下,显著优于标准方法,验证了其在真实工业场景下的有效性。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

We address a practical scenario of anomaly detection for industrial sound data, where the sound of a target machine is corrupted by background noise and interference from neighboring machines. Overcoming this challenge is difficult since the interference is often virtually indistinguishable from the target machine without additional information. To address the issue, we propose SSAD, a framework of source separation (SS) followed by anomaly detection (AD), which leverages machine activity information, often readily available in practical settings. SSAD consists of two components: (i) activity-informed SS, enabling effective source separation even given interference with similar timbre, and (ii) two-step masking, robustifying anomaly detection by emphasizing anomalies aligned with the machine activity. Our experiments demonstrate that SSAD achieves comparable accuracy to a baseline with full access to clean signals, while SSAD is provided only a corrupted signal and activity information. In addition, thanks to the activity-informed SS and AD with the two-step masking, SSAD outperforms standard approaches, particularly in cases with interference. It highlights the practical efficacy of SSAD in addressing the complexities of anomaly detection in industrial sound data.

异常检测声音分析工业应用

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。