测试大模型在隐私合规任务中的表现,发现其仍有明显不足。
How Privacy-Savvy Are Large Language Models? A Case Study on Compliance and Privacy Technical Review
- 构建隐私技术审查框架,评估大模型对隐私政策的解析能力。
- GPT-4 在关键点检测中 F1 值达 0.82,但整体仍不满足合规要求。
- 适合关注隐私合规自动化、法律科技研发的从业者参考。
大语言模型(LLMs)在文本生成、摘要和复杂问答等领域取得显著进展,但在隐私合规与技术隐私审查方面的应用仍不充分,引发对其是否符合全球隐私标准及保护用户敏感数据能力的担忧。本文通过案例研究,系统评估 BERT、GPT-3.5、GPT-4 及定制模型在隐私信息提取(PIE)、法律与监管要点检测(KPD)及隐私政策问答(QA)任务中的表现。引入隐私技术审查(PTR)框架,强调其在软件开发生命周期中降低隐私风险的作用。实验从精确率、召回率和 F1 值多维度衡量模型性能,结果显示尽管大模型在自动化隐私审查方面展现潜力,但其对不断演进的法律标准的全面遵循能力仍严重不足。研究提出增强模型能力的具体建议,强调需加强模型改进并与法律监管要求深度整合。本研究凸显开发具备隐私意识的 LLM 的紧迫性,以支持企业合规并保护用户隐私权利。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have significantly expanded their applications across various fields such as language generation, summarization, and complex question answering. However, their application to privacy compliance and technical privacy reviews remains under-explored, raising critical concerns about their ability to adhere to global privacy standards and protect sensitive user data. This paper seeks to address this gap by providing a comprehensive case study evaluating LLMs' performance in privacy-related tasks such as privacy information extraction (PIE), legal and regulatory key point detection (KPD), and question answering (QA) with respect to privacy policies and data protection regulations. We introduce a Privacy Technical Review (PTR) framework, highlighting its role in mitigating privacy risks during the software development life-cycle. Through an empirical assessment, we investigate the capacity of several prominent LLMs, including BERT, GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and custom models, in executing privacy compliance checks and technical privacy reviews. Our experiments benchmark the models across multiple dimensions, focusing on their precision, recall, and F1-scores in extracting privacy-sensitive information and detecting key regulatory compliance points. While LLMs show promise in automating privacy reviews and identifying regulatory discrepancies, significant gaps persist in their ability to fully comply with evolving legal standards. We provide actionable recommendations for enhancing LLMs' capabilities in privacy compliance, emphasizing the need for robust model improvements and better integration with legal and regulatory requirements. This study underscores the growing importance of developing privacy-aware LLMs that can both support businesses in compliance efforts and safeguard user privacy rights.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。