揭示跨模态知识蒸馏中领域差异的成因与影响
Non-target Divergence Hypothesis: Toward Understanding Domain Gaps in Cross-Modal Knowledge Distillation
- 提出非目标差异假设,解释模态间领域差距如何影响性能
- 发现非目标类分布差异越小,蒸馏效果越好
- 理论推导误差边界,为跨模态蒸馏提供新分析框架
相较于单模态知识蒸馏,跨模态知识蒸馏因模态间的领域差距面临更严峻挑战。尽管已有多种方法试图解决此问题,但对领域差距如何影响跨模态知识蒸馏的研究仍较有限。本文首次提出非目标差异假设(NTDH),揭示模态间领域差距会导致非目标类别分布差异,且差异越小,跨模态知识蒸馏性能越好。基于Vapnik-Chervonenkis(VC)理论,我们推导出跨模态知识蒸馏近似误差的上下界,从理论上验证了NTDH。在五个跨模态数据集上的实验进一步证实了该假设的有效性、泛化性和适用性。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Compared to single-modal knowledge distillation, cross-modal knowledge distillation faces more severe challenges due to domain gaps between modalities. Although various methods have proposed various solutions to overcome these challenges, there is still limited research on how domain gaps affect cross-modal knowledge distillation. This paper provides an in-depth analysis and evaluation of this issue. We first introduce the Non-Target Divergence Hypothesis (NTDH) to reveal the impact of domain gaps on cross-modal knowledge distillation. Our key finding is that domain gaps between modalities lead to distribution differences in non-target classes, and the smaller these differences, the better the performance of cross-modal knowledge distillation. Subsequently, based on Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) theory, we derive the upper and lower bounds of the approximation error for cross-modal knowledge distillation, thereby theoretically validating the NTDH. Finally, experiments on five cross-modal datasets further confirm the validity, generalisability, and applicability of the NTDH.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。