改进广告竞价策略,让预算控制更有效。
Cost-Control in Display Advertising: Theory vs Practice
- 修正理论竞价公式,引入实际收敛偏差的补偿机制。
- 真实数据实验显示成本超支减少50%。
- 适合关注预算精准控制的广告投放人员。
在展示广告中,广告主希望在预算和单次转化成本的约束下达成营销目标,通常被建模为带约束的优化问题,在对偶空间中在线求解。对于每次广告拍卖,使用最优竞价公式进行出价,假设对偶变量已达到最优;根据前序拍卖结果,对偶变量在线更新。然而,实践中对偶变量并非从初始即最优,而是渐进收敛,尤其在成本约束下收敛缓慢。我们发现,这种延迟导致成本控制失效。本文分析了最优竞价公式的缺陷,提出一种偏离理论推导的修正方法。通过模拟多种场景并结合大规模真实数据验证,新方法使成本违规降低50%,显著优于传统理论方案。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
In display advertising, advertisers want to achieve a marketing objective with constraints on budget and cost-per-outcome. This is usually formulated as an optimization problem that maximizes the total utility under constraints. The optimization is carried out in an online fashion in the dual space - for an incoming Ad auction, a bid is placed using an optimal bidding formula, assuming optimal values for the dual variables; based on the outcome of the previous auctions, the dual variables are updated in an online fashion. While this approach is theoretically sound, in practice, the dual variables are not optimal from the beginning, but rather converge over time. Specifically, for the cost-constraint, the convergence is asymptotic. As a result, we find that cost-control is ineffective. In this work, we analyse the shortcomings of the optimal bidding formula and propose a modification that deviates from the theoretical derivation. We simulate various practical scenarios and study the cost-control behaviors of the two algorithms. Through a large-scale evaluation on the real-word data, we show that the proposed modification reduces the cost violations by 50%, thereby achieving a better cost-control than the theoretical bidding formula.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。