揭示医疗推荐中公平性认知短板，呼吁加强算法公平教育
Understanding Fairness in Recommender Systems: A Healthcare Perspective
- 通过调查公众对四种公平性指标的理解程度，探索其在医疗场景中的认知现状
- 发现公众普遍缺乏对推荐系统公平性度量的准确理解，认知水平整体偏低
- 强调需结合具体场景设计公平性方案，避免一刀切的算法治理
AI驱动的决策系统在影响人类生命安全的领域日益重要，公平性问题尤为关键。本文从医疗推荐视角出发，调研公众对公平性的理解，让参与者在不同医疗情境下从四种公平性指标——人口均等性、准确率平等、机会均等性与阳性预测值——中进行选择，以评估其认知水平。结果表明，公平性是一个复杂且常被误解的概念，公众对推荐系统中公平性度量的理解普遍不足。研究强调，亟需加强算法公平性的信息传播与公众教育，以支持在使用这些系统时做出知情决策。此外，研究还提示，单一通用的公平性策略可能不适用，应重视在具体场景中设计具有上下文敏感性的公平机制。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Fairness in AI-driven decision-making systems has become a critical concern, especially when these systems directly affect human lives. This paper explores the public's comprehension of fairness in healthcare recommendations. We conducted a survey where participants selected from four fairness metrics -- Demographic Parity, Equal Accuracy, Equalized Odds, and Positive Predictive Value -- across different healthcare scenarios to assess their understanding of these concepts. Our findings reveal that fairness is a complex and often misunderstood concept, with a generally low level of public understanding regarding fairness metrics in recommender systems. This study highlights the need for enhanced information and education on algorithmic fairness to support informed decision-making in using these systems. Furthermore, the results suggest that a one-size-fits-all approach to fairness may be insufficient, pointing to the importance of context-sensitive designs in developing equitable AI systems.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。