30家大模型公司用政策限制使用,揭示AI自监管的现实与困境
Acceptable Use Policies for Foundation Models
- 分析30家厂商的使用政策,发现127项不同用途限制
- 政策碎片化影响产业链协同,且常隐匿执行标准
- 虽难落地但已成关键监管工具,影响学术与产业应用
随着基础模型用户突破数亿,开发者开始通过合法约束性政策禁止特定用途。本文梳理了30家基础模型开发者的可接受使用政策,分析其包含的使用限制,并指出这些政策是理解基础模型治理的重要视角。综合来看,开发者共设置127项不同的使用限制;不同厂商在数量和类型上的差异导致人工智能供应链出现碎片化。部分政策还被用于阻止竞争对手或特定行业使用其模型。开发者自行定义何为可接受使用,极少披露执行机制。实践中,这些政策难以有效执行,严格执行可能阻碍研究人员获取模型,限制有益应用。尽管如此,基础模型的可接受使用政策仍是早期自我监管的体现,在基础模型市场及整体人工智能生态中产生重大影响。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
As foundation models have accumulated hundreds of millions of users, developers have begun to take steps to prevent harmful types of uses. One salient intervention that foundation model developers adopt is acceptable use policies: legally binding policies that prohibit users from using a model for specific purposes. This paper identifies acceptable use policies from 30 foundation model developers, analyzes the use restrictions they contain, and argues that acceptable use policies are an important lens for understanding the regulation of foundation models. Taken together, developers' acceptable use policies include 127 distinct use restrictions; the wide variety in the number and type of use restrictions may create fragmentation across the AI supply chain. Developers also employ acceptable use policies to prevent competitors or specific industries from making use of their models. Developers alone decide what constitutes acceptable use, and rarely provide transparency about how they enforce their policies. In practice, acceptable use policies are difficult to enforce, and scrupulous enforcement can act as a barrier to researcher access and limit beneficial uses of foundation models. Nevertheless, acceptable use policies for foundation models are an early example of self-regulation that have a significant impact on the market for foundation models and the overall AI ecosystem.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。