评测大模型在多轮对话中利用外部检索增强回答的能力。
RAD-Bench: Evaluating Large Language Models Capabilities in Retrieval Augmented Dialogues
- 构建多轮检索增强对话评测基准,聚焦信息整合与推理能力。
- 发现模型在多轮对话中性能随条件复杂度上升而下降。
- 适合研究检索增强生成、对话系统评估的开发者与研究者。
在真实应用场景中,大型语言模型(LLMs)常通过外部检索机制(如搜索增强生成、工具调用和检索增强生成)提升对话生成质量。这些方法通常涉及多轮交互,每轮对话都通过从外部源检索相关资讯进行丰富。现有基准要么评估多轮对话中的聊天能力,要么评估单轮场景下检索增强响应的表现,但缺乏对多轮对话中利用检索实现精准回答能力的系统评估。为此,我们提出RAD-Bench(检索增强对话),一个专门评估LLMs在多轮对话中运用检索以保持并提升对话质量的能力的基准。该基准评估两个关键能力:检索合成与检索推理,通过判别性问题、检索上下文及参考答案来衡量模型整合与推理上下文的有效性。我们在常用LLMs上的评估结果显示,即便提供准确的检索内容,随着对话轮次中条件或约束层的增加,模型性能仍会下降。数据与代码已开源:https://github.com/mtkresearch/RAD-Bench。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
In real-world applications with Large Language Models (LLMs), external retrieval mechanisms - such as Search-Augmented Generation (SAG), tool utilization, and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) - are often employed to enhance the quality of augmented generations in dialogues. These approaches often come with multi-turn dialogue, where each interaction is enriched by relevant information retrieved from external sources. Existing benchmarks either assess LLMs' chat abilities in multi-turn dialogues or their use of retrieval for augmented responses in single-turn settings. However, there is a gap in evaluating LLMs' ability to leverage retrieval for more precise responses across multiple turns. To address this limitation, we introduce RAD-Bench (Retrieval Augmented Dialogue), a benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs' capabilities in multi-turn dialogues following retrievals, essential for their deployment in context-rich applications. RAD-Bench evaluates two key abilities of LLMs: Retrieval Synthesis and Retrieval Reasoning. These are measured using discriminative questions and retrieved contexts, and corresponding reference answers, assessing how effectively LLMs integrate and reason with context to maintain and enhance conversation quality over multiple turns. Our evaluation results on commonly used LLMs reveal that model performance deteriorates as additional layers of conditions or constraints are applied across conversation turns, even when accurate retrieved contexts are provided. The data and code are available at https://github.com/mtkresearch/RAD-Bench
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。