跨设备熔池异常检测准确率提升31%,无需目标数据标注
Investigation on domain adaptation of additive manufacturing monitoring systems to enhance digital twin reusability
- 构建跨设备知识迁移流程,实现不同增材制造设置间模型复用
- 在无目标标签数据情况下,熔池异常检测准确率提升31%
- 适用于多源设备、材料与参数下的数字孪生系统快速部署
粉末床熔融(PBF)是一种新兴的金属增材制造技术,可快速制造复杂结构,但过程中易出现孔隙、球化等缺陷,导致零件力学性能下降。由于部分缺陷具有随机性且外部不可见,质量保障面临挑战。数字孪生(DT)结合机器学习(ML)建模可用于过程监控与控制。熔池是常见的监控物理现象,通常通过高速相机采集图像。经标注与预处理后,熔池图像用于训练ML模型,实现异常检测与打印质量评估。然而,由于设备、相机、材料和工艺参数差异大,同一模型在不同设置下性能显著下降,限制了数字孪生的复用性。本文提出一种跨设置的知识迁移流程,以提升增材制造数字孪生的可复用性。数据来自美国国家标准与技术研究院(NIST)和台湾成功大学,涵盖不同相机、材料、设备及工艺参数。该流程包含四步:数据预处理、数据增强、域对齐与决策对齐。相比仅使用源数据训练的模型,该方法在无目标数据标签的情况下,将熔池异常检测准确率提升了31%。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Powder bed fusion (PBF) is an emerging metal additive manufacturing (AM) technology that enables rapid fabrication of complex geometries. However, defects such as pores and balling may occur and lead to structural unconformities, thus compromising the mechanical performance of the part. This has become a critical challenge for quality assurance as the nature of some defects is stochastic during the process and invisible from the exterior. To address this issue, digital twin (DT) using machine learning (ML)-based modeling can be deployed for AM process monitoring and control. Melt pool is one of the most commonly observed physical phenomena for process monitoring, usually by high-speed cameras. Once labeled and preprocessed, the melt pool images are used to train ML-based models for DT applications such as process anomaly detection and print quality evaluation. Nonetheless, the reusability of DTs is restricted due to the wide variability of AM settings, including AM machines and monitoring instruments. The performance of the ML models trained using the dataset collected from one setting is usually compromised when applied to other settings. This paper proposes a knowledge transfer pipeline between different AM settings to enhance the reusability of AM DTs. The source and target datasets are collected from the National Institute of Standards and Technology and National Cheng Kung University with different cameras, materials, AM machines, and process parameters. The proposed pipeline consists of four steps: data preprocessing, data augmentation, domain alignment, and decision alignment. Compared with the model trained only using the source dataset, this pipeline increased the melt pool anomaly detection accuracy by 31% without any labeled training data from the target dataset.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。