从生物演化角度解释意识如何由感官信息的主观价值驱动产生
Why Is Anything Conscious?
- 以生物体为起点,用层级化价值判断解释感官信息的自组织处理
- 自然选择偏好主动干预世界以维持生存与繁衍的系统
- 提出意识源于价值先于中性表征,适合研究意识机制的学者
本文从自然选择与具身生物体出发,构建形式化框架,描述人类等生物体如何通过价值导向的层级机制,对未标注的感官信息进行自组织解释。系统在不同时空尺度上被吸引或排斥,这种对物理状态的定性解读决定了行为策略,且仅区别于信息处理的质性特征。自然选择青睐能主动干预世界以达成稳态与繁殖目标的系统。死亡定义了意义,使信息处理必然具有主观性,即内在质量。定性处理涉及内感受与外感受分类器,决定自我生存优先级。我们提出心理物理因果原理作为定理,并证明最优学习迫使价值优先的本体论。好或坏的定性处理必然先于对属性(如“红色”)的中性表征。在复杂捕食压力下,形成多层级自我,反射性自我意识由此产生。讨论了现象意识与访问意识的经典区分,认为无访问的现象意识可能普遍,反之则不可能。该理论为意识的正式科学奠定基础,比僵尸虚构更贴近人类现实。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
We tackle the problem of consciousness by taking the naturally selected, embodied organism as our starting point. We provide a formalism describing how biological systems such as human bodies self-organize to hierarchically interpret unlabelled sensory information according to valence. The system is attracted and repelled at different spatial and temporal scales. This is a qualitative interpretation of an unlabelled physical state. We show how such interpretations imply behavioural policies which are differentiated from each other only by this qualitative aspect of information processing. Natural selection favours systems that actively intervene in the world to achieve homeostatic and reproductive goals. Put provocatively, death grounds meaning. This means that in living systems information processing is necessarily subjective, that is, it has quality embedded into its very core. Qualitative information processing involves interoceptive and exteroceptive classifiers, and determines priorities for self-survival. We formulate The Psychophysical Principle of Causality as a theorem, and prove generalisation optimal learning forces this valence first ontology. Qualitative good or bad processing necessarily comes \textit{before} quality neutral representations of properties (i.e. ``red'' is constructed from valence). Under selection pressures like sophisticated predation this produces a hierarchy of selves, of which reafference and reflective self awareness are a consequence. We discuss this in light of the seminal distinction between phenomenal and access consciousness. We claim that phenomenal consciousness without access is likely common, but the reverse is implausible. Our proposal lays the foundation of a formal science of consciousness, closer to human fact than zombie fiction.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。