瑞典AI讨论由学者主导，而非政界，且更关注风险与实质议题。
Setting the AI Agenda -- Evidence from Sweden in the ChatGPT Era
- 通过分析瑞典主流报纸社论，发现学术界在引导AI议程。
- 近年讨论转向更具体的风险议题，不再仅限于技术前景。
- 适合关注科技政策、公共讨论机制的研究者与政策制定者。
本文基于议程设置理论，考察了瑞典在ChatGPT发布前后人工智能元辩论的发展。研究发现，推动讨论的并非政党政治精英，而是相对沉默的政治家；真正引领舆论的是学术界。近年来，该议题逐渐转向更具实质性与风险导向的内容。研究采用2010年代初至今的原始精英文档数据集，分析多份瑞典主流报纸发表的社论，通过定性内容分析验证了这一假设：学术精英正主导着瑞典的AI公共讨论。初步结果支持了这一观点。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
This paper examines the development of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) meta-debate in Sweden before and after the release of ChatGPT. From the perspective of agenda-setting theory, we propose that it is an elite outside of party politics that is leading the debate -- i.e. that the politicians are relatively silent when it comes to this rapid development. We also suggest that the debate has become more substantive and risk-oriented in recent years. To investigate this claim, we draw on an original dataset of elite-level documents from the early 2010s to the present, using op-eds published in a number of leading Swedish newspapers. By conducting a qualitative content analysis of these materials, our preliminary findings lend support to the expectation that an academic, rather than a political elite is steering the debate.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。