arXiv:2409.19926math.OCcs.LG2024-09被引 1

解决风险估计中的乐观偏差,提升高风险决策的可靠性

Mitigating optimistic bias in entropic risk estimation and optimization

  • 用参数化自助法估计并校正熵风险的低估偏差
  • 在数据有限时,可避免过度保守或过于冒险的决策
  • 适合保险精算、金融风控等高风险场景应用

熵风险度量广泛应用于经济、管理科学、金融及安全关键控制系统中,因其能捕捉不确定损失的尾部风险。然而,在数据有限的情况下,基于样本平均的经验熵风险估计量会系统性低估真实风险,且该负偏差随损失分布右尾标准差的增加呈超线性增长。我们发现,现有用于经验风险的偏差修正技术要么仍低估熵风险,要么严重高估,可能导致决策过于激进或保守。为此,我们提出一种参数化自助方法,在弱正则性假设下具有强渐近一致性,并可控地高估熵风险。该方法先拟合数据分布,再通过自助抽样估计偏差。所选分布只需满足弱正则条件,高斯混合模型是其中便捷灵活的选择。作为应用,我们构建了一个考虑家庭损失相关性的保险合同设计分布鲁棒优化模型。结果表明,若不纠正验证集偏差,使用标准交叉验证选择正则化参数会导致保险公司样本外风险显著升高。我们的方法通过推荐更高且更准确的保费,更好反映底层尾部风险。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

The entropic risk measure is widely used in high-stakes decision-making across economics, management science, finance, and safety-critical control systems because it captures tail risks associated with uncertain losses. However, when data are limited, the empirical entropic risk estimator, formed by replacing the expectation in the risk measure with a sample average, underestimates true risk. We show that this negative bias grows superlinearly with the standard deviation of the loss for distributions with unbounded right tails. We further demonstrate that several existing bias reduction techniques developed for empirical risk either continue to underestimate entropic risk or substantially overestimate it, potentially leading to overly risky or overly conservative decisions. To address this issue, we develop a parametric bootstrap procedure that is strongly asymptotically consistent and provides a controlled overestimation of entropic risk under mild assumptions. The method first fits a distribution to the data and then estimates the empirical estimator's bias via bootstrapping. We show that the fitted distribution must satisfy only weak regularity conditions, and Gaussian mixture models offer a convenient and flexible choice within this class. As an application, we introduce a distributionally robust optimization model for an insurance contract design problem that incorporates correlations in household losses. We show that selecting regularization parameters using standard cross-validation can lead to substantially higher out-of-sample risk for the insurer if the validation bias is not corrected. Our approach improves performance by recommending higher and more accurate premiums, thereby better reflecting the underlying tail risk.

风险评估熵风险偏差校正保险优化

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。