用字符画评测大模型对文本中视觉语义的感知能力。
ASCIIEval: Benchmarking Models' Visual Perception in Text Strings via ASCII Art
- 构建字符画基准ASCIIEval,涵盖3000+样本,支持多模态测试。
- 开源模型在图像输入下准确率比闭源模型低超20%,且无法融合双模态优势。
- 模型性能受字符画长度影响,提示需改进跨模态融合机制。
理解连续字符中嵌入的视觉语义是大型语言模型(LLMs)和多模态大语言模型(MLLMs)的关键能力,但尚未得到充分研究。本文以字符画(ASCII art)为典型范例,其通过字符排列表达概念,兼具文本与图像双重属性。我们将其建模为识别任务,构建新基准ASCIIEval,包含超过3000个样本及详细分类体系,并提供训练集以支持模型优化。通过在多种输入模态下对数十个模型进行综合分析,验证了该基准的多重诊断能力。在纯文本输入下,语言模型展现出对字符画概念的视觉感知能力;闭源模型在某些类别上准确率超70%,其中GPT-5表现最佳。在图像输入下,开源MLLMs在细粒度文字识别与整体视觉感知间存在权衡,对这类艺术形式泛化能力有限,与闭源模型相比准确率差距超过20.01%。另一关键发现是模型性能对字符画长度敏感,且敏感性随输入模态变化。值得注意的是,所有模型均未能从双模态同时输入中获益,凸显现有模态融合方法的局限性。本文还提出增强方案并讨论未来方向。资源详见https://github.com/JiaQiSJTU/VisionInText。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Perceiving visual semantics embedded within consecutive characters is a crucial yet under-explored capability for both Large Language Models (LLMs) and Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs). In this work, we select ASCII art as a representative artifact. It depicts concepts through careful arrangement of characters, which can be formulated in both text and image modalities. We frame the problem as a recognition task, and construct a novel benchmark, ASCIIEval. It covers over 3K samples with an elaborate categorization tree, along with a training set for further enhancement. Encompassing a comprehensive analysis of tens of models through different input modalities, our benchmark demonstrate its multi-faceted diagnostic power. Given textual input, language models shows their visual perception ability on ASCII art concepts. Proprietary models achieve over 70% accuracy on certain categories, with GPT-5 topping the rank. For image inputs, we reveal that open-source MLLMs suffer from a trade-off between fine-grained text recognition and collective visual perception. They exhibit limited generalization ability to this special kind of arts, leading to the dramatic gap of over 20.01% accuracy compared with their proprietary counterparts. Another critical finding is that model performance is sensitive to the length of the ASCII art, with this sensitivity varying across input modalities. Unfortunately, none of the models could successfully benefit from the simultaneous provision of both modalities, highlighting the need for more flexible modality-fusion approaches. Besides, we also introduce approaches for further enhancement and discuss future directions. Resources are available at https://github.com/JiaQiSJTU/VisionInText.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。