arXiv:2410.02275cs.LG2024-10被引 12

提出高效算法实现约束MDP的最优强遗憾与违规控制

Optimal Strong Regret and Violation in Constrained MDPs via Policy Optimization

  • 采用原-对偶框架,用先进策略优化方法处理主问题
  • 实现√T量级的强遗憾与强违规,达到理论最优
  • 适合追求高效且严格满足约束的强化学习应用

我们研究约束马尔可夫决策过程(CMDPs)中的在线学习,目标是获得次线性强遗憾和强累积约束违规。与标准(弱)版本不同,这些度量不允许负项补偿正项,带来更大挑战。Efroni等(2020)首次提出具备次线性强遗憾与强违规的算法,但依赖线性规划,效率极低,因此如何通过更高效的策略优化方法实现次线性界成为开放问题。最近Muller等(2024)提出一种策略优化方法,实现了˜O(T^0.93)的强遗憾/违规。本文正面回答该问题:设计了一种高效策略优化算法,达到˜O(√T)的强遗憾/违规。算法采用原-对偶结构,主问题使用针对对抗性(无约束)MDPs的前沿策略优化方法,对偶变量采用类似UCB的更新方式。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

We study online learning in \emph{constrained MDPs} (CMDPs), focusing on the goal of attaining sublinear strong regret and strong cumulative constraint violation. Differently from their standard (weak) counterparts, these metrics do not allow negative terms to compensate positive ones, raising considerable additional challenges. Efroni et al. (2020) were the first to propose an algorithm with sublinear strong regret and strong violation, by exploiting linear programming. Thus, their algorithm is highly inefficient, leaving as an open problem achieving sublinear bounds by means of policy optimization methods, which are much more efficient in practice. Very recently, Muller et al. (2024) have partially addressed this problem by proposing a policy optimization method that allows to attain $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(T^{0.93})$ strong regret/violation. This still leaves open the question of whether optimal bounds are achievable by using an approach of this kind. We answer such a question affirmatively, by providing an efficient policy optimization algorithm with $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{T})$ strong regret/violation. Our algorithm implements a primal-dual scheme that employs a state-of-the-art policy optimization approach for adversarial (unconstrained) MDPs as primal algorithm, and a UCB-like update for dual variables.

强化学习约束优化在线学习策略优化

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。