用少量标签实现真实环境下的大麻使用自动检测
CUDLE: Learning Under Label Scarcity to Detect Cannabis Use in Uncontrolled Environments
- 通过自监督对比学习提取传感器数据特征
- 仅用25%标签即达73.4%准确率,优于监督方法
- 适合标签稀缺的实时健康监测场景
可穿戴传感器系统在实时客观监测生理健康以支持行为干预方面展现出巨大潜力。然而,在自由生活环境中获取准确标签仍面临挑战,因缺乏人工监督且依赖患者自报,导致数据采集与有监督学习尤为困难。为此,我们提出CUDLE(Cannabis Use Detection with Label Efficiency),一种利用真实世界可穿戴传感器数据进行自监督学习的新框架,旨在解决自动检测自由生活环境中大麻使用这一紧迫医疗问题。CUDLE通过对比学习框架,利用传感器数据识别大麻使用时刻。首先通过数据增强完成自监督预训练,学习鲁棒表征;随后在下游任务中使用浅层分类器微调。为评估该方法,我们对20名大麻使用者开展临床研究,收集超过500小时的可穿戴传感器数据,并通过EMA(生态瞬时评估)方法获取用户自报的大麻使用时间点。分析显示,CUDLE在有限标签条件下表现更优,准确率达73.4%,高于监督方法的71.1%。值得注意的是,当标签量减少时性能差距扩大,且在仅使用25%标签的情况下仍超越传统方法,同时在更少受试者下即可达到峰值性能。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Wearable sensor systems have demonstrated a great potential for real-time, objective monitoring of physiological health to support behavioral interventions. However, obtaining accurate labels in free-living environments remains difficult due to limited human supervision and the reliance on self-labeling by patients, making data collection and supervised learning particularly challenging. To address this issue, we introduce CUDLE (Cannabis Use Detection with Label Efficiency), a novel framework that leverages self-supervised learning with real-world wearable sensor data to tackle a pressing healthcare challenge: the automatic detection of cannabis consumption in free-living environments. CUDLE identifies cannabis consumption moments using sensor-derived data through a contrastive learning framework. It first learns robust representations via a self-supervised pretext task with data augmentation. These representations are then fine-tuned in a downstream task with a shallow classifier, enabling CUDLE to outperform traditional supervised methods, especially with limited labeled data. To evaluate our approach, we conducted a clinical study with 20 cannabis users, collecting over 500 hours of wearable sensor data alongside user-reported cannabis use moments through EMA (Ecological Momentary Assessment) methods. Our extensive analysis using the collected data shows that CUDLE achieves a higher accuracy of 73.4%, compared to 71.1% for the supervised approach, with the performance gap widening as the number of labels decreases. Notably, CUDLE not only surpasses the supervised model while using 75% less labels, but also reaches peak performance with far fewer subjects.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。