arXiv:2410.04107cs.CVcs.CL2024-10被引 5

测试大模型在无法回答的问题上是否诚实,发现顶级模型准确率仅69%

TUBench: Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models on Trustworthiness with Unanswerable Questions

  • 设计10种策略生成无法回答的问题,覆盖代码、图像、几何、表格四类场景
  • 28个主流模型测试中,最高准确率69.2%,表明模型易误判不可答问题
  • 专为评估模型可信度而设,适合研究幻觉、评测可靠性的人参考

大型视觉语言模型(LVLMs)在视觉感知和语言理解方面取得了显著进展,但仍存在幻觉问题,即生成与输入不符的内容。传统基准如MME和POPE仅评估可回答问题中的幻觉,而对因图像信息不足导致的不可回答问题缺乏考察。为此,我们提出TUBench,一个专门用于评估LVLMs在不可回答问题上的可靠性的基准。TUBench包含通过10种策略精心构建的高质量不可回答问题,基于四种不同领域图像:代码截图、自然图像、几何图示和统计表格截图。这些问题分别测试模型在代码推理、常识推理、几何推理和表格数学推理中的可信度。我们对28个主流基础模型进行了全面定量评估,其中表现最佳的Gemini-1.5-Pro平均准确率为69.2%,排名第三的GPT-4o达到66.7%。TUBench已开源:https://github.com/NLPCode/TUBench。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have achieved remarkable progress on visual perception and linguistic interpretation. Despite their impressive capabilities across various tasks, LVLMs still suffer from the issue of hallucination, which involves generating content that is incorrect or unfaithful to the visual or textual inputs. Traditional benchmarks, such as MME and POPE, evaluate hallucination in LVLMs within the scope of Visual Question Answering (VQA) using answerable questions. However, some questions are unanswerable due to insufficient information in the images, and the performance of LVLMs on such unanswerable questions remains underexplored. To bridge this research gap, we propose TUBench, a benchmark specifically designed to evaluate the reliability of LVLMs using unanswerable questions. TUBench comprises an extensive collection of high-quality, unanswerable questions that are meticulously crafted using ten distinct strategies. To thoroughly evaluate LVLMs, the unanswerable questions in TUBench are based on images from four diverse domains as visual contexts: screenshots of code snippets, natural images, geometry diagrams, and screenshots of statistical tables. These unanswerable questions are tailored to test LVLMs' trustworthiness in code reasoning, commonsense reasoning, geometric reasoning, and mathematical reasoning related to tables, respectively. We conducted a comprehensive quantitative evaluation of 28 leading foundational models on TUBench, with Gemini-1.5-Pro, the top-performing model, achieving an average accuracy of 69.2%, and GPT-4o, the third-ranked model, reaching 66.7% average accuracy, in determining whether questions are answerable. TUBench is available at https://github.com/NLPCode/TUBench.

视觉语言模型可信度评估幻觉检测

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。