用博弈论框架优化GAN与对抗训练的神经网络架构搜索。
Double Oracle Neural Architecture Search for Game Theoretic Deep Learning Models
- 引入双奥拉克尔机制,通过最优响应策略生成模型并求解元策略。
- 在MNIST、CIFAR-10等数据集上,新方法在生成质量与抗攻击性上显著提升。
- 适用于追求高鲁棒性和高质量生成的深度学习架构设计者。
本文提出一种基于博弈论的新型深度学习模型训练方法,将生成对抗网络(GAN)和对抗训练(AT)建模为两玩家零和博弈,其中生成器与判别器或攻击者与分类器为对弈双方。传统训练面临纯纳什均衡不存在或混合纳什均衡难求的问题,因策略空间过大。在此基础上,扩展前期工作DO-GAN,将双奥拉克尔框架应用于对抗神经架构搜索(DONAS-GAN与DONAS-AT)。首先将玩家策略泛化为来自最优响应预言机的训练模型,再通过线性规划计算元策略;为提升可扩展性,采用剪枝策略剔除弱占优的策略以避免预言机过载。在MNIST、CIFAR-10和TinyImageNet上测试DONAS-GAN,同时在CIFAR-10、SVHN和TinyImageNet上评估其在FGSM和PGD攻击下的鲁棒性。结果表明,所有变体在主观视觉质量和客观指标上均显著优于基线架构。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
In this paper, we propose a new approach to train deep learning models using game theory concepts including Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and Adversarial Training (AT) where we deploy a double-oracle framework using best response oracles. GAN is essentially a two-player zero-sum game between the generator and the discriminator. The same concept can be applied to AT with attacker and classifier as players. Training these models is challenging as a pure Nash equilibrium may not exist and even finding the mixed Nash equilibrium is difficult as training algorithms for both GAN and AT have a large-scale strategy space. Extending our preliminary model DO-GAN, we propose the methods to apply the double oracle framework concept to Adversarial Neural Architecture Search (NAS for GAN) and Adversarial Training (NAS for AT) algorithms. We first generalize the players' strategies as the trained models of generator and discriminator from the best response oracles. We then compute the meta-strategies using a linear program. For scalability of the framework where multiple network models of best responses are stored in the memory, we prune the weakly-dominated players' strategies to keep the oracles from becoming intractable. Finally, we conduct experiments on MNIST, CIFAR-10 and TinyImageNet for DONAS-GAN. We also evaluate the robustness under FGSM and PGD attacks on CIFAR-10, SVHN and TinyImageNet for DONAS-AT. We show that all our variants have significant improvements in both subjective qualitative evaluation and quantitative metrics, compared with their respective base architectures.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。