arXiv:2410.06352cs.LG2024-10被引 8

用决策树检测并控制概念瓶颈模型中的信息泄露问题

Tree-Based Leakage Inspection and Control in Concept Bottleneck Models

  • 通过对比硬模型与软模型的决策路径,量化信息泄露程度
  • 在概念信息不全时,软模型会扩展决策路径,暴露泄露问题
  • 适用于需要可解释性与透明性的高风险AI应用

随着AI模型规模增大,问责制和可解释性对理解其决策过程愈发关键。概念瓶颈模型(CBMs)通过将输入映射到中间概念再进行最终预测,提升了可解释性。然而,CBMs常存在信息泄露问题:额外未被概念捕捉的输入数据被用于提升任务性能,干扰下游预测的解释。本文提出一种新方法,用于训练联合与顺序型CBMs,利用决策树识别并控制泄露。通过比较硬CBM与软泄漏型CBM的决策路径,发现软模型在概念信息不全时会扩展路径,从而揭示泄露。基于此,我们开发了更有效的泄露检测与管理技术,定位受泄露影响最严重的数据子集。在合成与真实世界实验中,该方法不仅提升任务准确率,还生成更具信息量与透明度的解释。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

As AI models grow larger, the demand for accountability and interpretability has become increasingly critical for understanding their decision-making processes. Concept Bottleneck Models (CBMs) have gained attention for enhancing interpretability by mapping inputs to intermediate concepts before making final predictions. However, CBMs often suffer from information leakage, where additional input data, not captured by the concepts, is used to improve task performance, complicating the interpretation of downstream predictions. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach for training both joint and sequential CBMs that allows us to identify and control leakage using decision trees. Our method quantifies leakage by comparing the decision paths of hard CBMs with their soft, leaky counterparts. Specifically, we show that soft leaky CBMs extend the decision paths of hard CBMs, particularly in cases where concept information is incomplete. Using this insight, we develop a technique to better inspect and manage leakage, isolating the subsets of data most affected by this. Through synthetic and real-world experiments, we demonstrate that controlling leakage in this way not only improves task accuracy but also yields more informative and transparent explanations.

可解释AI概念瓶颈信息泄露决策树

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。