调研学生在不同编程课程中使用生成式AI的现状与变化。
Students' Perceptions and Use of Generative AI Tools for Programming Across Different Computing Courses
- 通过三次调查追踪学生在59门课程中使用GenAI的情况
- 发现学生对GenAI的使用和态度随课程目标而异
- 适合教育研究者和课程设计者参考
针对生成式人工智能(GenAI)在教育中的应用,现有研究多聚焦于单一时间点的大规模异质群体。然而,学生对GenAI的认知与使用可能受背景知识、工具熟悉度及课程学习目标与政策的影响。本研究探讨了在不同计算类课程中,本科生与研究生如何使用GenAI完成编程任务:包括以编程为核心目标的课程、将编程作为实现其他目标手段的课程,以及编程可选但有用的相关课程。研究采用三轮问卷调查(2023年秋季、冬季、2024年春季),覆盖一所大型欧洲研究型大学所有计算专业学生,共收集264份有效反馈。问题涵盖教育使用、伦理认知与就业前景,并特别关注各课程对GenAI使用的允许程度。通过定量与定性分析,揭示了学生在59门不同课程中对GenAI的实际使用模式及其随时间的变化趋势。研究为区分不同课程中GenAI的应用策略,以及将其与课程学习目标对齐提供了实证支持。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Investigation of students' perceptions and opinions on the use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in education is a topic gaining much interest. Studies addressing this are typically conducted with large heterogeneous groups, at one moment in time. However, how students perceive and use GenAI tools can potentially depend on many factors, including their background knowledge, familiarity with the tools, and the learning goals and policies of the courses they are taking. In this study we explore how students following computing courses use GenAI for programming-related tasks across different programs and courses: Bachelor and Master, in courses in which learning programming is the learning goal, courses that require programming as a means to achieve another goal, and in courses in which programming is optional, but can be useful. We are also interested in changes over time, since GenAI capabilities are changing at a fast pace, and users are adopting GenAI increasingly. We conducted three consecutive surveys (fall `23, winter `23, and spring `24) among students of all computing programs of a large European research university. We asked questions on the use in education, ethics, and job prospects, and we included specific questions on the (dis)allowed use of GenAI tools in the courses they were taking at the time. We received 264 responses, which we quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed, to find out how students have employed GenAI tools across 59 different computing courses, and whether the opinion of an average student about these tools evolves over time. Our study contributes to the emerging discussion of how to differentiate GenAI use across different courses, and how to align its use with the learning goals of a computing course.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。