首次为基于方差估计的Q-learning算法建立依赖于状态差距的更优后悔界。
Gap-Dependent Bounds for Q-Learning using Reference-Advantage Decomposition
- 提出新误差分解框架,分析参考优势分解下的Q-learning性能。
- 得到对数级后悔界,显著优于传统方法在结构良好环境中的表现。
- 首次分析策略切换成本的差距依赖上界,适用于强化学习优化场景。
我们研究了两类针对有限时域、表格型马尔可夫决策过程(MDPs)的在线策略Q-learning算法——UCB-Advantage(Zhang等, 2020)和Q-EarlySettled-Advantage(Li等, 2021)的差距依赖后悔界。这两类算法使用方差估计器构造奖励项并采用参考-优势分解进行方差缩减,相比基于Hoeffding型奖励的方法,在最坏情况下实现了几乎最优的√T型后悔界(T为总步数)。然而,当MDP具有严格正的次优性差距时,性能可大幅改善。尽管已有针对基于Hoeffding型奖励的Q-learning的差距依赖后悔界,但使用方差估计器与参考-优势分解的算法尚无此类分析。本文通过构建新颖的误差分解框架,首次建立了上述两算法的对数级差距依赖后悔界,且优于现有结果。此外,还首次为UCB-Advantage提供了策略切换成本的差距依赖上界,并改进了最坏情况下的结果。本工作填补了该方向的重要空白。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
We study the gap-dependent bounds of two important algorithms for on-policy Q-learning for finite-horizon episodic tabular Markov Decision Processes (MDPs): UCB-Advantage (Zhang et al. 2020) and Q-EarlySettled-Advantage (Li et al. 2021). UCB-Advantage and Q-EarlySettled-Advantage improve upon the results based on Hoeffding-type bonuses and achieve the almost optimal $\sqrt{T}$-type regret bound in the worst-case scenario, where $T$ is the total number of steps. However, the benign structures of the MDPs such as a strictly positive suboptimality gap can significantly improve the regret. While gap-dependent regret bounds have been obtained for Q-learning with Hoeffding-type bonuses, it remains an open question to establish gap-dependent regret bounds for Q-learning using variance estimators in their bonuses and reference-advantage decomposition for variance reduction. We develop a novel error decomposition framework to prove gap-dependent regret bounds of UCB-Advantage and Q-EarlySettled-Advantage that are logarithmic in $T$ and improve upon existing ones for Q-learning algorithms. Moreover, we establish the gap-dependent bound for the policy switching cost of UCB-Advantage and improve that under the worst-case MDPs. To our knowledge, this paper presents the first gap-dependent regret analysis for Q-learning using variance estimators and reference-advantage decomposition and also provides the first gap-dependent analysis on policy switching cost for Q-learning.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。