通过图像识别钻头磨损位置与类型,自动定位故障根源。
You Only Look Twice! for Failure Causes Identification of Drill Bits
- 用两阶段YOLO模型检测钻头刀片位置和损伤类型。
- 规则方法准确率超决策树和随机森林,F1达0.94。
- 全流程自动化可100%识别24类故障,适合工程诊断场景。
高效识别钻头失效的根本原因对避免运营损失、安全风险和工期延误至关重要。早期发现可实现主动维护,降低突发故障带来的风险与成本。本研究基于不同刀片的图像,通过标注刀片位置与损伤类型,构建了两个YOLO定位与损伤检测模型,并采用多分类多标签决策树与随机森林模型,结合刀片位置与损伤类型判断失效原因。此外,提出一种规则增强型分类器RRFCI。结果显示,刀片位置检测模型达到0.97 mPA,损伤检测模型为0.49 mPA。规则方法在失效原因识别上优于决策树与随机森林,所有损伤类型的宏平均F1-score达0.94。完整自动化流程在独立测试集上对10个钻头的24类故障实现100%准确识别,展现出显著辅助专家诊断的潜力。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Efficient identification of the root causes of drill bit failure is crucial due to potential impacts such as operational losses, safety threats, and delays. Early recognition of these failures enables proactive maintenance, reducing risks and financial losses associated with unforeseen breakdowns and prolonged downtime. Thus, our study investigates various causes of drill bit failure using images of different blades. The process involves annotating cutters with their respective locations and damage types, followed by the development of two YOLO Location and Damage Cutter Detection models, as well as multi-class multi-label Decision Tree and Random Forests models to identify the causes of failure by assessing the cutters' location and damage type. Additionally, RRFCI is proposed for the classification of failure causes. Notably, the cutter location detection model achieved a high score of 0.97 mPA, and the cutter damage detection model yielded a 0.49 mPA. The rule-based approach over-performed both DT and RF in failure cause identification, achieving a macro-average F1-score of 0.94 across all damage causes. The integration of the complete automated pipeline successfully identified 100\% of the 24 failure causes when tested on independent sets of ten drill bits, showcasing its potential to efficiently assist experts in identifying the root causes of drill bit damages.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。