用逻辑规则提升医疗问答的精准与推理能力
MedLogic-AQA: Enhancing Medical Question Answering with Abstractive Models Focusing on Logical Structures
- 基于一阶逻辑规则构建推理框架,增强答案生成的逻辑性
- 在MedQA和BioASQ上显著优于基线模型,人类评估更优
- 适合需要高可信度医疗决策支持的临床研究者使用
在医疗问答任务中,准确回应复杂医学问题亟需有效系统。现有方法常难以理解医学语境中的深层逻辑结构与关系,限制了回答的精确性与细致程度。本文提出新型抽象型问答系统MedLogic-AQA,利用从上下文和问题中提取的一阶逻辑(FOL)规则生成有依据的答案。初步实验识别出六条关键一阶逻辑规则,并据此训练逻辑理解(LU)模型以生成逻辑三元组。这些三元组被融入MedLogic-AQA训练,实现生成过程中的有效且连贯的推理。该系统融合逻辑推理与抽象生成,使答案更具逻辑性、相关性与可读性。自动与人工评估均证明其在多个基准上优于强基线模型。案例分析验证了其在推理深度与信息丰富度上的显著提升。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
In Medical question-answering (QA) tasks, the need for effective systems is pivotal in delivering accurate responses to intricate medical queries. However, existing approaches often struggle to grasp the intricate logical structures and relationships inherent in medical contexts, thus limiting their capacity to furnish precise and nuanced answers. In this work, we address this gap by proposing a novel Abstractive QA system MedLogic-AQA that harnesses First Order Logic (FOL) based rules extracted from both context and questions to generate well-grounded answers. Through initial experimentation, we identified six pertinent first-order logical rules, which were then used to train a Logic-Understanding (LU) model capable of generating logical triples for a given context, question, and answer. These logic triples are then integrated into the training of MedLogic-AQA, enabling effective and coherent reasoning during answer generation. This distinctive fusion of logical reasoning with abstractive QA equips our system to produce answers that are logically sound, relevant, and engaging. Evaluation with respect to both automated and human-based demonstrates the robustness of MedLogic-AQA against strong baselines. Through empirical assessments and case studies, we validate the efficacy of MedLogic-AQA in elevating the quality and comprehensiveness of answers in terms of reasoning as well as informativeness
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。