arXiv:2410.15553cs.CL2024-10被引 93

评测大模型在多轮跨语言指令下的理解能力,发现越往后越容易出错。

Multi-IF: Benchmarking LLMs on Multi-Turn and Multilingual Instructions Following

  • 构建包含4501条多轮跨语言对话的新评测基准
  • 模型多轮执行准确率逐轮下降,第三轮平均降至0.707
  • 非拉丁字母语言(如中文、俄文)错误率更高,暴露多语能力短板

大型语言模型在各类任务中表现出色,尤其在遵循指令方面至关重要。然而,由于人类语言的复杂性和主观性,评估模型遵循指令的能力仍具挑战性。现有评测主要聚焦单轮单语指令,无法反映真实场景中多轮多语言交互的复杂性。为此,我们提出Multi-IF,一个结合大模型与人工标注的混合框架,扩展IFEval基准,引入多轮对话序列,并将英文提示翻译为7种其他语言,形成4501条多语言对话数据集,每条含三轮交互。对14个前沿LLM的评估显示,该基准更具挑战性:所有模型在每轮中正确执行指令的比例均下降。例如,o1-preview在三轮中的平均准确率从第一轮的0.877降至0.707。此外,使用非拉丁字母语言(如印地语、俄语、中文)时错误率普遍更高,表明模型在多语言理解上存在局限。我们已开源Multi-IF提示和评估代码,以推动该领域研究。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in various tasks, including instruction following, which is crucial for aligning model outputs with user expectations. However, evaluating LLMs' ability to follow instructions remains challenging due to the complexity and subjectivity of human language. Current benchmarks primarily focus on single-turn, monolingual instructions, which do not adequately reflect the complexities of real-world applications that require handling multi-turn and multilingual interactions. To address this gap, we introduce Multi-IF, a new benchmark designed to assess LLMs' proficiency in following multi-turn and multilingual instructions. Multi-IF, which utilizes a hybrid framework combining LLM and human annotators, expands upon the IFEval by incorporating multi-turn sequences and translating the English prompts into another 7 languages, resulting in a dataset of 4,501 multilingual conversations, where each has three turns. Our evaluation of 14 state-of-the-art LLMs on Multi-IF reveals that it presents a significantly more challenging task than existing benchmarks. All the models tested showed a higher rate of failure in executing instructions correctly with each additional turn. For example, o1-preview drops from 0.877 at the first turn to 0.707 at the third turn in terms of average accuracy over all languages. Moreover, languages with non-Latin scripts (Hindi, Russian, and Chinese) generally exhibit higher error rates, suggesting potential limitations in the models' multilingual capabilities. We release Multi-IF prompts and the evaluation code base to encourage further research in this critical area.

指令跟随多轮对话多语言评测基准

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。