预测基金新持仓比预测整体组合更难,需专用模型。
A Case Study of Next Portfolio Prediction for Mutual Funds
- 将基金持仓预测转为新资产推荐任务,聚焦首次买入
- 仅预测新持仓时自编码器效果优于主流推荐模型
- 简单规则在混合预测中反而更优,凸显领域特殊性
共同基金旨在获得超越市场平均的收益。尽管预测其未来投资组合可带来经济优势,但该任务仍具挑战且研究较少。为此,本文将基金持仓预测建模为「下一新篮子推荐」(NNBR)任务,专注于预测基金下一期持仓中的新资产。我们基于公开数据构建了全面的基准数据集,并评估多种推荐系统模型在该任务上的表现。结果表明,预测新资产比预测完整组合或重复资产更具挑战性;当同时预测新旧资产时,最先进推荐模型的表现被简单启发式方法超越;而自编码器方法在仅预测新资产时表现出色。研究揭示了在应用推荐系统于基金组合预测时,必须考虑领域特异性。预测完整组合或重复资产与预测新资产之间的性能差距,凸显了该任务的复杂性,也表明需持续研发更鲁棒、更适应性强的模型以应对这一关键金融应用场景。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Mutual funds aim to generate returns above market averages. While predicting their future portfolio allocations can bring economic advantages, the task remains challenging and largely unexplored. To fill that gap, this work frames mutual fund portfolio prediction as a Next Novel Basket Recommendation (NNBR) task, focusing on predicting novel items in a fund's next portfolio. We create a comprehensive benchmark dataset using publicly available data and evaluate the performance of various recommender system models on the NNBR task. Our findings reveal that predicting novel items in mutual fund portfolios is inherently more challenging than predicting the entire portfolio or only repeated items. While state-of-the-art NBR models are outperformed by simple heuristics when considering both novel and repeated items together, autoencoder-based approaches demonstrate superior performance in predicting only new items. The insights gained from this study highlight the importance of considering domain-specific characteristics when applying recommender systems to mutual fund portfolio prediction. The performance gap between predicting the entire portfolio or repeated items and predicting novel items underscores the complexity of the NNBR task in this domain and the need for continued research to develop more robust and adaptable models for this critical financial application.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。