提出新方法提升图异常检测,用多维重构误差特征取代平均误差
Rethinking Reconstruction-based Graph-Level Anomaly Detection: Limitations and a Simple Remedy
- 用多维度重构误差替代单一平均误差作为图特征
- 在10个数据集上超越14种方法,达到当前最优性能
- 适用于需要高精度图异常检测的科研与工业场景
图自编码器(Graph-AEs)通过精确重构图来学习图表示,其在图级异常检测(GLAD)中应用广泛,目标是识别拓扑结构或节点特征与多数图不同的异常图。现有方法基于假设:若图的平均重构误差较高,则为异常。本文揭示该假设存在非平凡反例,即重构翻转现象,并从实证与理论两方面分析该假设成立与失效的条件。研究发现,虽然单个图的重构误差可作为有效特征,但仅使用均值会忽略更多信息。因此,本文提出简单而有效的新型方法MUSE,通过多维度总结重构误差构建图特征。该方法在10个数据集上表现卓越,优于14种现有方法,达到当前最优水平。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Graph autoencoders (Graph-AEs) learn representations of given graphs by aiming to accurately reconstruct them. A notable application of Graph-AEs is graph-level anomaly detection (GLAD), whose objective is to identify graphs with anomalous topological structures and/or node features compared to the majority of the graph population. Graph-AEs for GLAD regard a graph with a high mean reconstruction error (i.e. mean of errors from all node pairs and/or nodes) as anomalies. Namely, the methods rest on the assumption that they would better reconstruct graphs with similar characteristics to the majority. We, however, report non-trivial counter-examples, a phenomenon we call reconstruction flip, and highlight the limitations of the existing Graph-AE-based GLAD methods. Specifically, we empirically and theoretically investigate when this assumption holds and when it fails. Through our analyses, we further argue that, while the reconstruction errors for a given graph are effective features for GLAD, leveraging the multifaceted summaries of the reconstruction errors, beyond just mean, can further strengthen the features. Thus, we propose a novel and simple GLAD method, named MUSE. The key innovation of MUSE involves taking multifaceted summaries of reconstruction errors as graph features for GLAD. This surprisingly simple method obtains SOTA performance in GLAD, performing best overall among 14 methods across 10 datasets.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。