arXiv:2410.21611physics.ins-detcs.LG2024-10被引 67

评测10种生成模型在高能物理快速探测器模拟中的表现

CaloChallenge 2022: A Community Challenge for Fast Calorimeter Simulation

  • 用多种生成模型处理从几百到数万像素的粒子流数据
  • 综合评估生成质量、速度和模型大小,覆盖10+指标
  • 为生成模型评价提供系统方法,适用于其他复杂领域

我们汇报了2022年‘快速探测器模拟挑战赛’(CaloChallenge)的结果。研究针对四组维度递增的探测器粒子流数据集(从数百个体素到数万个体素),评估了31个参赛方案所采用的前沿生成模型,涵盖变分自编码器(VAEs)、生成对抗网络(GANs)、归一化流、扩散模型及基于条件流匹配的模型。评估指标包括可观测量的一维直方图差异、KPD/FPD得分、二分类器的AUC值以及多分类器的对数后验概率。结果提供了迄今为止最全面的快速探测器模拟生成方法综述,并深入探讨了生成模型评估的系统性方法。该工作对需在大相空间中快速生成高保真样本的其他生成式AI领域具有重要参考价值。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

We present the results of the "Fast Calorimeter Simulation Challenge 2022" - the CaloChallenge. We study state-of-the-art generative models on four calorimeter shower datasets of increasing dimensionality, ranging from a few hundred voxels to a few tens of thousand voxels. The 31 individual submissions span a wide range of current popular generative architectures, including Variational AutoEncoders (VAEs), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Normalizing Flows, Diffusion models, and models based on Conditional Flow Matching. We compare all submissions in terms of quality of generated calorimeter showers, as well as shower generation time and model size. To assess the quality we use a broad range of different metrics including differences in 1-dimensional histograms of observables, KPD/FPD scores, AUCs of binary classifiers, and the log-posterior of a multiclass classifier. The results of the CaloChallenge provide the most complete and comprehensive survey of cutting-edge approaches to calorimeter fast simulation to date. In addition, our work provides a uniquely detailed perspective on the important problem of how to evaluate generative models. As such, the results presented here should be applicable for other domains that use generative AI and require fast and faithful generation of samples in a large phase space.

生成模型高能物理探测器模拟模型评估

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。