arXiv:2410.23327q-bio.QMcs.CV2024-10被引 1

用深度学习模型PhenoFormer提升气候变化下的植物物候预测精度

Deep learning meets tree phenology modeling: PhenoFormer vs. process-based models

  • 基于注意力机制设计新神经网络PhenoFormer,适应气候分布变化下的物候预测
  • 在瑞士70年、7万条数据上,春秋季预测准确率比传统机器学习高11%-13%
  • 无需完全理解生理机制即可实现媲美甚至超越传统机理模型的性能

物候学研究植物生命周期事件(如萌芽、变色)的时间规律,对生物气候系统至关重要。气候变化正改变这些事件发生时间,影响生态系统与气候反馈。准确的物候模型对预测未来变化至关重要。现有方法包括基于假设的机理模型和数据驱动的统计方法。机理模型能考虑休眠阶段与多种驱动因子,而统计方法多依赖线性或传统机器学习。研究表明,机理模型在历史范围外的气候情景下表现更优。然而,深度学习在物候建模中仍少有探索。本文提出PhenoFormer,一种更适合应对气候数据分布偏移的神经架构,在保持对机理模型竞争力的同时,显著优于传统机器学习方法。在瑞士9种木本植物、70年共7万条观测数据上,PhenoFormer对春季物候的预测平均提升13% R²和1.1天RMSE,秋季提升11% R²和0.7天RMSE,且达到或超过最优机理模型水平。结果表明,深度学习具备成为精准气候-物候预测工具的潜力,PhenoFormer是尚未完全理解生理机制前的重要进展。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Phenology, the timing of cyclical plant life events such as leaf emergence and coloration, is crucial in the bio-climatic system. Climate change drives shifts in these phenological events, impacting ecosystems and the climate itself. Accurate phenology models are essential to predict the occurrence of these phases under changing climatic conditions. Existing methods include hypothesis-driven process models and data-driven statistical approaches. Process models account for dormancy stages and various phenology drivers, while statistical models typically rely on linear or traditional machine learning techniques. Research shows that process models often outperform statistical methods when predicting under climate conditions outside historical ranges, especially with climate change scenarios. However, deep learning approaches remain underexplored in climate phenology modeling. We introduce PhenoFormer, a neural architecture better suited than traditional statistical methods at predicting phenology under shift in climate data distribution, while also bringing significant improvements or performing on par to the best performing process-based models. Our numerical experiments on a 70-year dataset of 70,000 phenological observations from 9 woody species in Switzerland show that PhenoFormer outperforms traditional machine learning methods by an average of 13% R2 and 1.1 days RMSE for spring phenology, and 11% R2 and 0.7 days RMSE for autumn phenology, while matching or exceeding the best process-based models. Our results demonstrate that deep learning has the potential to be a valuable methodological tool for accurate climate-phenology prediction, and our PhenoFormer is a first promising step in improving phenological predictions before a complete understanding of the underlying physiological mechanisms is available.

物候建模深度学习气候预测

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。