通过逐点噪声分析提升高斯过程对稀疏异常值的鲁棒性
Robust Gaussian Processes via Relevance Pursuit
- 用逐次选择法推断每点噪声水平,最大化边缘似然
- 模型在噪声方差上具强凹性,保证优化稳定性与近似可证
- 适合标签含稀疏异常值的回归与贝叶斯优化任务
高斯过程(GPs)是灵活、数据高效且不确定性估计校准良好的非参数概率回归模型。然而,标准GP假设同方差高斯噪声,而真实场景常存在非高斯扰动。已有增强鲁棒性的变体,但往往在精度与鲁棒性、计算成本与理论保障间存在权衡。本文提出一种新GP模型,通过逐次选择程序(称为相关性追求)推断数据点特定噪声水平,以最大化对数边缘似然,从而实现对稀疏异常值的鲁棒性。令人惊讶的是,该模型可参数化为在数据点噪声方差上具有强凹性,这一性质在鲁棒回归目标或GP边缘似然中极为罕见。这进一步意味着子集选择问题的弱次模性,从而为算法提供近似保证。我们在多样回归和贝叶斯优化任务中评估模型性能,包括标签在函数范围内或附近存在稀疏扰动的挑战性场景。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Gaussian processes (GPs) are non-parametric probabilistic regression models that are popular due to their flexibility, data efficiency, and well-calibrated uncertainty estimates. However, standard GP models assume homoskedastic Gaussian noise, while many real-world applications are subject to non-Gaussian corruptions. Variants of GPs that are more robust to alternative noise models have been proposed, and entail significant trade-offs between accuracy and robustness, and between computational requirements and theoretical guarantees. In this work, we propose and study a GP model that achieves robustness against sparse outliers by inferring data-point-specific noise levels with a sequential selection procedure maximizing the log marginal likelihood that we refer to as relevance pursuit. We show, surprisingly, that the model can be parameterized such that the associated log marginal likelihood is strongly concave in the data-point-specific noise variances, a property rarely found in either robust regression objectives or GP marginal likelihoods. This in turn implies the weak submodularity of the corresponding subset selection problem, and thereby proves approximation guarantees for the proposed algorithm. We compare the model's performance relative to other approaches on diverse regression and Bayesian optimization tasks, including the challenging but common setting of sparse corruptions of the labels within or close to the function range.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。