arXiv:2411.02426q-bio.QMcs.AI2024-11综述被引 9

深度学习可精准预测胶质瘤分子特征,助力无创诊断

Diagnostic performance of deep learning for predicting glioma isocitrate dehydrogenase and 1p/19q co-deletion in MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • 用MRI数据训练深度学习模型,自动识别肿瘤分子状态
  • 对IDH突变预测准确率80%以上,1p/19q共缺失达75%
  • 适合神经影像与肿瘤精准医疗研究者参考

本研究旨在评估基于深度学习的放射组学模型在胶质瘤患者中通过MRI非侵入性预测异柠檬酸脱氢酶(IDH)突变及1p/19q共缺失状态的诊断性能,并识别影响准确性与泛化能力的方法学因素。根据PRISMA指南,系统检索至2025年3月的PubMed、Scopus、Embase、Web of Science和Google Scholar数据库,筛选利用深度学习从MRI数据预测分子状态的研究。采用放射组学质量评分和QUADAS-2工具评估研究质量与偏倚风险。元分析采用双变量模型计算合并敏感度与特异度,通过元回归分析研究间异质性。1517篇文献中,104篇纳入定性合成,72篇进行元分析。测试队列中IDH预测的合并敏感度为0.80,特异度为0.85;1p/19q共缺失的敏感度为0.75,特异度为0.82。元回归显示肿瘤分割方法及深度学习在放射组学流程中的整合程度是影响结果差异的关键因素。尽管深度学习在胶质瘤无创分子分型方面展现强大潜力,但临床转化仍需多中心数据标准化(如直方图匹配、基于深度学习的风格迁移)、标准化自动化分割、大规模多中心外部验证及前瞻性临床验证。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Objectives We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of deep learning (DL)-based radiomics models for the noninvasive prediction of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation and 1p/19q co-deletion status in glioma patients using MRI sequences, and to identify methodological factors influencing accuracy and generalizability. Materials and methods Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched major databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) up to March 2025, screening studies that utilized DL to predict IDH and 1p/19q co-deletion status from MRI data. We assessed study quality and risk of bias using the Radiomics Quality Score and the QUADAS-2 tool. Our meta-analysis employed a bivariate model to compute pooled sensitivity and specificity, and meta-regression to assess interstudy heterogeneity. Results Among the 1517 unique publications, 104 were included in the qualitative synthesis, and 72 underwent meta-analysis. Pooled estimates for IDH prediction in test cohorts yielded a sensitivity of 0.80 and specificity of 0.85. For 1p/19q co-deletion, sensitivity was 0.75 and specificity was 0.82. Meta-regression identified the tumor segmentation method and the extent of DL integration into the radiomics pipeline as significant contributors to interstudy variability. Conclusion Although DL models demonstrate strong potential for noninvasive molecular classification of gliomas, clinical translation requires several critical steps: harmonization of multi-center MRI data using techniques such as histogram matching and DL-based style transfer; adoption of standardized and automated segmentation protocols; extensive multi-center external validation; and prospective clinical validation.

深度学习胶质瘤MRI分子预测

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。