arXiv:2411.05318cs.LGcs.DS2024-11被引 1

提出公平的k-子模最大化算法,兼顾性能与公平性。

Fairness in Monotone $k$-submodular Maximization: Algorithms and Applications

  • 设计了1/3近似率的贪心算法,运行时间O(knB)
  • 在影响力传播和传感器部署中,公平约束不显著降低效果
  • 适用于需多类别公平分配的机器学习场景

子模优化在机器学习中日益重要,公平性也受到广泛关注。本文首次研究公平k-子模最大化问题,提出一种1/3近似率的贪心算法,运行时间为O(knB)。据我们所知,这是首个将公平性引入k-子模最大化的工作,理论保证与无公平约束时最优结果一致。此外,还开发了一种更快的阈值算法,达到(1/3 - ε)近似,函数评估次数为O(kn/ε · log(B/ε))。针对函数不可访问仅能近似获取的情况,也为两种算法提供了近似保证。通过大量实验验证理论成果,分析公平性的实际影响。具体案例研究包括具有k个主题的影响力最大化和具有k类别的传感器部署。实验表明,公平约束对解的质量影响较小。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Submodular optimization has become increasingly prominent in machine learning and fairness has drawn much attention. In this paper, we propose to study the fair $k$-submodular maximization problem and develop a $\frac{1}{3}$-approximation greedy algorithm with a running time of $\mathcal{O}(knB)$. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first to incorporate fairness in the context of $k$-submodular maximization, and our theoretical guarantee matches the best-known $k$-submodular maximization results without fairness constraints. In addition, we have developed a faster threshold-based algorithm that achieves a $(\frac{1}{3} - ε)$ approximation with $\mathcal{O}(\frac{kn}ε \log \frac{B}ε)$ evaluations of the function $f$. Furthermore, for both algorithms, we provide approximation guarantees when the $k$-submodular function is not accessible but only can be approximately accessed. We have extensively validated our theoretical findings through empirical research and examined the practical implications of fairness. Specifically, we have addressed the question: ``What is the price of fairness?" through case studies on influence maximization with $k$ topics and sensor placement with $k$ types. The experimental results show that the fairness constraints do not significantly undermine the quality of solutions.

子模优化公平性算法设计

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。