发现模型目标决定表征相似性跨数据集一致性
Objective drives the consistency of representational similarity across datasets
- 通过系统方法测量不同数据集上模型表征相似性变化
- 自监督视觉模型的表征相似性跨数据集泛化更强
- 任务行为与表征相似性关联依赖于数据集类型
柏拉图表征假说认为,近期基础模型正基于下游任务性能收敛到共享的表征空间,与训练目标和数据模态无关(Huh et al., 2024)。但表征相似性通常在单个数据集上测量,跨数据集并不一致。我们提出一种系统方法,分析模型表征相似性随刺激数据集变化的规律。结果表明,目标函数是决定表征相似性跨数据集一致性的关键因素:自监督视觉模型的相对成对相似性比图像分类或图文模型更能在不同数据集间泛化;且表征相似性与模型任务行为的相关性具有数据集依赖性,尤其在单域数据集上最为显著。本研究为跨数据集分析模型表征相似性并关联任务行为差异提供了框架。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The Platonic Representation Hypothesis claims that recent foundation models are converging to a shared representation space as a function of their downstream task performance, irrespective of the objectives and data modalities used to train these models (Huh et al., 2024). Representational similarity is generally measured for individual datasets and is not necessarily consistent across datasets. Thus, one may wonder whether this convergence of model representations is confounded by the datasets commonly used in machine learning. Here, we propose a systematic way to measure how representational similarity between models varies with the set of stimuli used to construct the representations. We find that the objective function is a crucial factor in determining the consistency of representational similarities across datasets. Specifically, self-supervised vision models learn representations whose relative pairwise similarities generalize better from one dataset to another compared to those of image classification or image-text models. Moreover, the correspondence between representational similarities and the models' task behavior is dataset-dependent, being most strongly pronounced for single-domain datasets. Our work provides a framework for analyzing similarities of model representations across datasets and linking those similarities to differences in task behavior.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。