帮开发者按用户偏好排序隐私机器学习技术。
Which PPML Would a User Choose? A Structured Decision Support Framework for Developers to Rank PPML Techniques Based on User Acceptance Criteria
- 基于用户可感知属性,建立隐私技术选择框架。
- 在隐私信息分类任务中验证,实现技术排名。
- 适合关注用户体验的开发者快速选型。
使用隐私增强技术(PETs)进行机器学习常影响其计算资源、响应时间及数据使用方式。开发者在设计新服务时需权衡不同技术的利弊,例如引入噪声虽提升隐私但可能降低模型精度。目前尚无系统方法将用户对服务的感知反馈用于选择隐私保护机器学习(PPML)技术,尤其因用户缺乏技术背景,无法直接表达对特定技术的偏好。本研究提出一种决策支持框架,将用户接受标准(UAC)转化为可比较的PPML技术特征,实现基于用户偏好的技术排序,并为开发者提供技术洞察。通过隐私信息分类用例验证,该框架包含连接PPML技术与用户标准的流程、评估技术差异特性的方法,以及针对具体场景的最优技术排序机制。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Using Privacy-Enhancing Technologies (PETs) for machine learning often influences the characteristics of a machine learning approach, e.g., the needed computational power, timing of the answers or how the data can be utilized. When designing a new service, the developer faces the problem that some decisions require a trade-off. For example, the use of a PET may cause a delay in the responses or adding noise to the data to improve the users' privacy might have a negative impact on the accuracy of the machine learning approach. As of now, there is no structured way how the users' perception of a machine learning based service can contribute to the selection of Privacy Preserving Machine Learning (PPML) methods. This is especially a challenge since one cannot assume that users have a deep technical understanding of these technologies. Therefore, they can only be asked about certain attributes that they can perceive when using the service and not directly which PPML they prefer. This study introduces a decision support framework with the aim of supporting the selection of PPML technologies based on user preferences. Based on prior work analysing User Acceptance Criteria (UAC), we translate these criteria into differentiating characteristics for various PPML techniques. As a final result, we achieve a technology ranking based on the User Acceptance Criteria while providing technology insights for the developers. We demonstrate its application using the use case of classifying privacy-relevant information. Our contribution consists of the decision support framework which consists of a process to connect PPML technologies with UAC, a process for evaluating the characteristics that separate PPML techniques, and a ranking method to evaluate the best PPML technique for the use case.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。