arXiv:2411.07322eess.IVcs.CV2024-11综述被引 1

AI助力便携式乳腺超声筛查,提升诊断效率与可及性

Artificial Intelligence-Informed Handheld Breast Ultrasound for Screening: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Test Accuracy

  • 用AI自动分析超声图像,辅助医生识别和分类乳腺病变
  • 34项研究使用超570万张图像,多数任务表现良好但质量参差
  • 适合关注AI医疗落地、资源有限地区筛查的从业者

乳腺癌筛查中,乳腺钼靶在高收入国家显著降低死亡率,但低收入和中等收入国家缺乏相关资源。便携式乳腺超声(BUS)成本低,但依赖专业培训。人工智能(AI)赋能的BUS可辅助乳腺癌的检测(感知)与分类(解读)。本系统综述遵循PRISMA与SWiM指南,检索2016年1月1日至2023年12月12日的PubMed与Google Scholar文献。共筛选763项候选研究,审查314篇全文,最终纳入34项研究。研究按AI任务类型、应用阶段和任务分类:1项帧选择、6项检测、11项分割、16项分类。研究共使用超过18.5万名患者的570万张超声图像进行模型训练或验证,仅1项研究包含前瞻性测试集。79%的研究存在高风险或不确定偏倚。尽管各任务均显示高性能,但整体证据稳健性不足。未来高质量模型验证将是实现AI增强超声在资源受限环境中扩大筛查覆盖的关键。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Background. Breast cancer screening programs using mammography have led to significant mortality reduction in high-income countries. However, many low- and middle-income countries lack resources for mammographic screening. Handheld breast ultrasound (BUS) is a low-cost alternative but requires substantial training. Artificial intelligence (AI) enabled BUS may aid in both the detection (perception) and classification (interpretation) of breast cancer. Materials and Methods. This review (CRD42023493053) is reported in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) and SWiM (Synthesis Without Meta-analysis) guidelines. PubMed and Google Scholar were searched from January 1, 2016 to December 12, 2023. A meta-analysis was not attempted. Studies are grouped according to their AI task type, application time, and AI task. Study quality is assessed using the QUality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Results. Of 763 candidate studies, 314 total full texts were reviewed. 34 studies are included. The AI tasks of included studies are as follows: 1 frame selection, 6 detection, 11 segmentation, and 16 classification. In total, 5.7 million BUS images from over 185,000 patients were used for AI training or validation. A single study included a prospective testing set. 79% of studies were at high or unclear risk of bias. Conclusion. There has been encouraging development of AI for BUS. Despite studies demonstrating high performance across all identified tasks, the evidence supporting AI-enhanced BUS generally lacks robustness. High-quality model validation will be key to realizing the potential for AI-enhanced BUS in increasing access to screening in resource-limited environments.

AI医疗乳腺超声筛查资源有限

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。