基于深度网络的多指标医学图像分割质量控制框架
SegQC: a segmentation network-based framework for multi-metric segmentation quality control and segmentation error detection in volumetric medical images
- 用深度网络分析扫描与分割掩码,逐体素输出错误概率
- 在胎儿脑、体及胎盘上实现74%以上召回率的错误区域检测
- 相比传统方法更精准评估分割质量,适合临床质检与模型优化
体积医学图像中结构分割的质量控制对识别临床分割错误和促进模型开发至关重要。本文提出SegQC,一种基于分割网络的新型框架,用于分割质量估计与错误检测。该框架在全扫描及单个切片层面估算分割质量,并定位可能的分割错误区域。核心组件包括:1)SegQC-Net,一个输入扫描及其分割掩码并输出每个体素错误概率的深度网络;2)三个新提出的分割质量度量:两个重叠度量和一个结构大小度量,均基于错误概率计算;3)一种基于错误概率的切片级分割错误检测方法。我们引入了一种新评估方案,基于放射科专家修正自动分割结果,降低观察者差异并更贴近真实错误。在198例胎儿MRI扫描中测试了三个胎儿结构(胎儿脑、胎儿体、胎盘)的性能。与无监督的测试时增强(TTA)方法对比,SegQC在胎儿脑和胎儿体分割的质量评估中,皮尔逊相关性和平均绝对误差均表现更优。其分割错误检测方法在胎儿体上的召回率和精确率为0.77和0.48,在胎儿脑上为0.74和0.55。该框架提升了整体扫描与单切片分割质量度量的准确性,并实现了错误区域定位。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Quality control of structures segmentation in volumetric medical images is important for identifying segmentation errors in clinical practice and for facilitating model development. This paper introduces SegQC, a novel framework for segmentation quality estimation and segmentation error detection. SegQC computes an estimate measure of the quality of a segmentation in volumetric scans and in their individual slices and identifies possible segmentation error regions within a slice. The key components include: 1. SegQC-Net, a deep network that inputs a scan and its segmentation mask and outputs segmentation error probabilities for each voxel in the scan; 2. three new segmentation quality metrics, two overlap metrics and a structure size metric, computed from the segmentation error probabilities; 3. a new method for detecting possible segmentation errors in scan slices computed from the segmentation error probabilities. We introduce a new evaluation scheme to measure segmentation error discrepancies based on an expert radiologist corrections of automatically produced segmentations that yields smaller observer variability and is closer to actual segmentation errors. We demonstrate SegQC on three fetal structures in 198 fetal MRI scans: fetal brain, fetal body and the placenta. To assess the benefits of SegQC, we compare it to the unsupervised Test Time Augmentation (TTA)-based quality estimation. Our studies indicate that SegQC outperforms TTA-based quality estimation in terms of Pearson correlation and MAE for fetal body and fetal brain structures segmentation. Our segmentation error detection method achieved recall and precision rates of 0.77 and 0.48 for fetal body, and 0.74 and 0.55 for fetal brain segmentation error detection respectively. SegQC enhances segmentation metrics estimation for whole scans and individual slices, as well as provides error regions detection.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。