用多个大模型自动提取科学论文中的深度学习方法细节。
Harnessing multiple LLMs for Information Retrieval: A case study on Deep Learning methodologies in Biodiversity publications
- 五模型投票+RAG增强,从文本中自动抽取方法信息。
- 在生物多样性论文上达69.5%准确率,仅靠文本即接近人工水平。
- 适合需要复现、知识整合的科研人员和领域综述者。
深度学习技术广泛应用于各科学领域解决复杂问题,但其方法细节常隐藏于非结构化文本中,难以获取与理解。为解决此问题,本文结合五种开源大语言模型(Llama-3 70B、Llama-3.1 70B、Mixtral-8x22B-Instruct-v0.1、Mixtral 8x7B、Gemma 2 9B)与检索增强生成(RAG)方法,自动提取并处理科学论文中的深度学习方法信息。通过集成五个模型输出构建投票分类器,提升信息抽取准确性。基于此前研究,我们在生物多样性领域测试该方法,使用两个数据集:100篇精选论文和来自《生态信息学》期刊的364篇论文。结果表明,多模型协同的RAG管道显著提升了方法信息的检索能力,在仅依赖文本的情况下,准确率达69.5%(600次对比中正确417次),与能访问代码、图表等补充材料的人工标注者表现相当。该方法不仅适用于生物多样性,亦可推广至其他需严谨方法报告的科学领域,为提升研究可复现性与知识传递提供可扩展、可靠的信息抽取方案。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Deep Learning (DL) techniques are increasingly applied in scientific studies across various domains to address complex research questions. However, the methodological details of these DL models are often hidden in the unstructured text. As a result, critical information about how these models are designed, trained, and evaluated is challenging to access and comprehend. To address this issue, in this work, we use five different open-source Large Language Models (LLMs): Llama-3 70B, Llama-3.1 70B, Mixtral-8x22B-Instruct-v0.1, Mixtral 8x7B, and Gemma 2 9B in combination with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) approach to extract and process DL methodological details from scientific publications automatically. We built a voting classifier from the outputs of five LLMs to accurately report DL methodological information. We tested our approach using biodiversity publications, building upon our previous research. To validate our pipeline, we employed two datasets of DL-related biodiversity publications: a curated set of 100 publications from our prior work and a set of 364 publications from the Ecological Informatics journal. Our results demonstrate that the multi-LLM, RAG-assisted pipeline enhances the retrieval of DL methodological information, achieving an accuracy of 69.5% (417 out of 600 comparisons) based solely on textual content from publications. This performance was assessed against human annotators who had access to code, figures, tables, and other supplementary information. Although demonstrated in biodiversity, our methodology is not limited to this field; it can be applied across other scientific domains where detailed methodological reporting is essential for advancing knowledge and ensuring reproducibility. This study presents a scalable and reliable approach for automating information extraction, facilitating better reproducibility and knowledge transfer across studies.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。