开发者如何看待生成式AI的版权与许可问题
Developer Perspectives on Licensing and Copyright Issues Arising from Generative AI for Software Development
- 调研574名开发者，了解其对生成代码版权的看法
- 多数开发者视AI生成代码如现有代码，但对归属权分歧大
- 关注数据泄露风险，适合政策制定者和企业参考
尽管生成式AI（GenAI）工具在编写代码等任务中具有实用价值，但其使用也引发重要的法律问题与潜在风险，尤其是与版权法相关的问题。随着立法者和监管机构对此展开讨论，用户视角尤为重要。本文提供了：（1）对574名开发者的问卷调查及后续访谈；（2）在GenAI技术及其认知快速演变背景下，开发者观点的即时快照；（3）对开发者意见的分析，提炼出可为未来监管决策提供参考的洞见与建议。结果表明，开发者普遍认可GenAI带来的收益，认为AI生成代码与使用现有代码类似，但在代码所有权或补偿归属上存在分歧，且高度关注通过GenAI造成的数据泄露风险，为组织与政策制定者提供了技术实际应用情况及利益相关方关切的重要洞察。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Despite the utility that Generative AI (GenAI) tools provide for tasks such as writing code, the use of these tools raises important legal questions and potential risks, particularly those associated with copyright law. As lawmakers and regulators engage with those questions, the views of users can provide relevant perspectives. In this paper, we provide: (1) a survey of 574 developers on the licensing and copyright aspects of GenAI for coding, as well as follow-up interviews; (2) a snapshot of developers' views at a time when GenAI and perceptions of it are rapidly evolving; and (3) an analysis of developers' views, yielding insights and recommendations that can inform future regulatory decisions in this evolving field. Our results show the benefits developers derive from GenAI, how they view the use of AI-generated code as similar to using other existing code, the varied opinions they have on who should own or be compensated for such code, that they are concerned about data leakage via GenAI, and much more, providing organizations and policymakers with valuable insights into how the technology is being used and what concerns stakeholders would like to see addressed.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。