探究人机共写中如何保持作者真实声音，发现个性化工具有助创作认同
"It was 80% me, 20% AI": Seeking Authenticity in Co-Writing with Large Language Models
- 通过访谈19位专业作家，对比个性化与非个性化AI辅助写作体验
- 作家更认可个性化工具，但认为其应促进成长而非仅改写文本
- 读者难分辨人机合写作品，且对技术尝试持开放态度
随着大型语言模型驱动的写作辅助工具日益普及，创作者与读者均可能担忧其对写作真实性的影响。本文研究作者在人机共写中如何维护自身真实声音，以及个性化辅助是否有助于实现这一目标。通过对19位专业作家进行半结构化访谈，让他们使用个性化和非个性化AI工具共同创作，并结合30位活跃读者在线问卷调查收集对人机合写作品的看法。研究发现，真实性更多关乎创作过程与自我建构的体验，而非单纯文本输出。尽管作家对个性化工具反应积极，但认为个性化应关注作者成长，而不仅限于文本生成阶段。读者普遍不区分人机合写与纯人工写作，且对作者探索新技术持正面态度。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Given the rising proliferation and diversity of AI writing assistance tools, especially those powered by large language models (LLMs), both writers and readers may have concerns about the impact of these tools on the authenticity of writing work. We examine whether and how writers want to preserve their authentic voice when co-writing with AI tools and whether personalization of AI writing support could help achieve this goal. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 19 professional writers, during which they co-wrote with both personalized and non-personalized AI writing-support tools. We supplemented writers' perspectives with opinions from 30 avid readers about the written work co-produced with AI collected through an online survey. Our findings illuminate conceptions of authenticity in human-AI co-creation, which focus more on the process and experience of constructing creators' authentic selves. While writers reacted positively to personalized AI writing tools, they believed the form of personalization needs to target writers' growth and go beyond the phase of text production. Overall, readers' responses showed less concern about human-AI co-writing. Readers could not distinguish AI-assisted work, personalized or not, from writers' solo-written work and showed positive attitudes toward writers experimenting with new technology for creative writing.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。