用混合方法构建跨学科性别研究数据集,揭示其发展脉络与影响力。
Delineating Feminist Studies through bibliometric analysis
- 结合核心期刊与BERTopic关键词挖掘,构建跨学科文献集。
- 覆盖190万篇1668至2023年多语言论文,支持主题与合作分析。
- 方法可推广至其他跨领域研究,如酷儿研究或社会运动议题。
女性主义研究具有跨学科与社会根基的特性,给文献计量分析带来挑战。本文提出一种新方法,识别分散在各科学领域的性别/性相关出版物。基于Dimensions数据库,结合文献计量学、自然语言处理(NLP)与人工校验,构建涵盖190万篇1668至2023年发表的多语言科学文献数据集。通过核心期刊集合与标题关键词检索相结合的方式,关键词由对核心文献标题和摘要进行主题建模(BERTopic)获取。该两阶段方法反映了性别研究与其与不同学科之间的动态互动,克服了传统手工关键词枚举带来的偏见。该数据集可用于刻画性别研究的主题分布、引用与合作网络,以及机构与区域参与情况。本方法为分析“超越学科”的研究领域提供了可迁移的范式。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The multidisciplinary and socially anchored nature of Feminist Studies presents unique challenges for bibliometric analysis, as this research area transcends traditional disciplinary boundaries and reflects discussions from feminist and LGBTQIA+ social movements. This paper proposes a novel approach for identifying gender/sex related publications scattered across diverse scientific disciplines. Using the Dimensions database, we employ bibliometric techniques, natural language processing (NLP) and manual curation to compile a dataset of scientific publications that allows for the analysis of Gender Studies and its influence across different disciplines. This is achieved through a methodology that combines a core of specialized journals with a comprehensive keyword search over titles. These keywords are obtained by applying Topic Modeling (BERTopic) to the corpus of titles and abstracts from the core. This methodological strategy, divided into two stages, reflects the dynamic interaction between Gender Studies and its dialogue with different disciplines. This hybrid system surpasses basic keyword search by mitigating potential biases introduced through manual keyword enumeration. The resulting dataset comprises over 1.9 million scientific documents published between 1668 and 2023, spanning four languages. This dataset enables a characterization of Gender Studies in terms of addressed topics, citation and collaboration dynamics, and institutional and regional participation. By addressing the methodological challenges of studying "more-than-disciplinary" research areas, this approach could also be adapted to delineate other conversations where disciplinary boundaries are difficult to disentangle.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。