对比非英语母语者与ChatGPT处理嵌套句的能力，发现人类大脑仍更优。
Non-native speakers of English or ChatGPT: Who thinks better?
- 用中心嵌套句测试人类与ChatGPT的语法理解能力
- 15名非英语母语者表现优于ChatGPT，尤其在复杂结构解析上
- 适合关注AI语言能力局限的研究者与教育工作者
本研究旨在回答一个核心问题：非英语母语者与ChatGPT谁的思维能力更强？通过分析中心嵌套英语句子的处理与理解，结果表明人类大脑在语言处理上仍远超ChatGPT，且不能将ChatGPT视为语言理论。研究招募了15名非英语母语者作为参与者，向他们及ChatGPT呈现中心嵌套英语句子。结果显示，即使是在第二语言英语环境下，人类大脑在自然语言数据的处理与解释能力方面依然显著优于大型语言模型，尤其是非母语者表现出色。研究结论指出，人类大脑的语言处理能力具有独特性，而目前的ChatGPT仍无法企及这一人类独有的能力。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
This study sets out to answer one major question: Who thinks better, non-native speakers of English or ChatGPT?, providing evidence from processing and interpreting center-embedding English constructions that human brain surpasses ChatGPT, and that ChatGPT cannot be regarded as a theory of language. Fifteen non-native speakers of English were recruited as participants of the study. A center-embedding English sentence was presented to both the study participants and ChatGPT. The study findings unveil that human brain is still far ahead of Large Language Models, specifically ChatGPT, even in the case of non-native speakers of an L2, here English. The study concludes that human brain's ability to process and interpret natural language data is unique and that ChatGPT still lags behind this human unique ability.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品；中文卡片由大模型生成，请以原文为准。