不标注小物体也能实现良好检测效果,值得重新评估标注成本。
Rethinking Annotation for Object Detection: Is Annotating Small-size Instances Worth Its Cost?
- 测试时放大图像,训练时缩小图像,避开小物体标注
- 新方法在COCO数据集上达到与全量标注模型相当的精度
- 可蒸馏为单路径模型,部署效率高,适合资源受限场景
小尺寸目标检测对人类和模型都极具挑战,因此标注成本高昂。本文质疑是否值得标注小物体:能否用不含小物体的训练数据训练出有效检测器?实验采用测试时图像上采样和训练时图像下采样的方法。在COCO数据集上的结果表明,结合域差距修正后,该方法性能至少与使用完整标注数据训练的基线模型相当。尽管需对同一图像进行两次推理,但通过模型蒸馏可获得单路径检测器,性能与基线一致。研究提示应重新审视目标检测中对小物体的标注策略。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Detecting objects occupying only small areas in an image is difficult, even for humans. Therefore, annotating small-size object instances is hard and thus costly. This study questions common sense by asking the following: is annotating small-size instances worth its cost? We restate it as the following verifiable question: can we detect small-size instances with a detector trained using training data free of small-size instances? We evaluate a method that upscales input images at test time and a method that downscales images at training time. The experiments conducted using the COCO dataset show the following. The first method, together with a remedy to narrow the domain gap between training and test inputs, achieves at least comparable performance to the baseline detector trained using complete training data. Although the method needs to apply the same detector twice to an input image with different scaling, we show that its distillation yields a single-path detector that performs equally well to the same baseline detector. These results point to the necessity of rethinking the annotation of training data for object detection.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。