构建可动态扩展的开放能力评估池,实现更全面、抗过拟合的模型评测。
ONEBench to Test Them All: Sample-Level Benchmarking Over Open-Ended Capabilities
- 将多数据集样本合并为统一池,支持自定义开放能力评测
- 算法可处理近95%数据缺失,评估成本降低20倍且排名稳定
- 适用于语言与视觉语言模型,支持持续演进的评测体系
传统固定测试集难以评估基础模型的开放能力。为此,我们提出ONEBench(开放能力评测),一种将多个评估数据集整合为统一、持续扩展的样本池的新范式。用户可从该池中生成定制化、开放式的评测基准,对应特定能力。通过跨数据集聚合样本,ONEBench能评估原测试集未覆盖的多样能力,同时缓解过拟合与数据集偏差问题。关键在于,它将模型评估转化为样本级测试的选择与聚合过程。这一转变带来两大挑战:异质性(跨不同指标聚合)和不完整性(在不同数据子集上评估模型)。为此,我们设计了聚合算法,确保可识别性(渐近恢复真实得分)与快速收敛,用更少数据实现准确模型排序。在同质数据集上,其排名与平均分高度相关;在约95%测量值缺失时仍保持稳健,评估成本最多降低20倍,模型排名几乎不变。我们分别推出ONEBench-LLM(语言模型)与ONEBench-LMM(视觉语言模型),统一跨领域评估。整体上,本工作提供一种开放能力评估技术,可聚合不完整、异质的样本级测量,随基础模型发展持续扩展评测基准。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Traditional fixed test sets fall short in evaluating open-ended capabilities of foundation models. To address this, we propose ONEBench(OpeN-Ended Benchmarking), a new testing paradigm that consolidates individual evaluation datasets into a unified, ever-expanding sample pool. ONEBench allows users to generate custom, open-ended evaluation benchmarks from this pool, corresponding to specific capabilities of interest. By aggregating samples across test sets, ONEBench enables the assessment of diverse capabilities beyond those covered by the original test sets, while mitigating overfitting and dataset bias. Most importantly, it frames model evaluation as a collective process of selecting and aggregating sample-level tests. The shift from task-specific benchmarks to ONEBench introduces two challenges: (1)heterogeneity and (2)incompleteness. Heterogeneity refers to the aggregation over diverse metrics, while incompleteness describes comparing models evaluated on different data subsets. To address these challenges, we explore algorithms to aggregate sparse measurements into reliable model scores. Our aggregation algorithm ensures identifiability(asymptotically recovering ground-truth scores) and rapid convergence, enabling accurate model ranking with less data. On homogenous datasets, we show our aggregation algorithm provides rankings that highly correlate with those produced by average scores. We also demonstrate robustness to ~95% of measurements missing, reducing evaluation cost by up to 20x with little-to-no change in model rankings. We introduce ONEBench-LLM for language models and ONEBench-LMM for vision-language models, unifying evaluations across these domains. Overall, we present a technique for open-ended evaluation, which can aggregate over incomplete, heterogeneous sample-level measurements to continually grow a benchmark alongside the rapidly developing foundation models.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。