联邦块项张量回归实现医疗数据隐私保护下的协同建模
Federated Block-Term Tensor Regression for decentralised data analysis in healthcare
- 将张量回归引入联邦学习,实现跨机构数据协作
- 在脑电和心脏病预测中均优于传统方法,最高准确率达0.772
- 适合医疗隐私敏感场景,支持真实临床数据应用
块项张量回归(BTTR)能有效建模高维复杂数据的多线性关系,适用于医疗与神经科学领域。但传统BTTR依赖集中式数据,存在隐私风险。为此,本文提出联邦块项张量回归(FBTTR),支持去中心化数据分析,在保护数据隐私的同时实现跨机构协作建模。实验在两个案例中验证:一是基于BCI Competition IV数据集的皮层脑电(ECoG)信号解码,对第3名受试者拇指运动预测准确率达0.76±0.05,优于集中式BTTR的0.71±0.05;二是使用真实临床数据集Fed-Heart-Disease进行心脏病预测,获得AUC-ROC 0.872±0.02与准确率0.772±0.02,优于集中式模型的0.812±0.003与0.753±0.007。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Block-Term Tensor Regression (BTTR) has proven to be a powerful tool for modeling complex, high-dimensional data by leveraging multilinear relationships, making it particularly well-suited for applications in healthcare and neuroscience. However, traditional implementations of BTTR rely on centralized datasets, which pose significant privacy risks and hinder collaboration across institutions. To address these challenges, we introduce Federated Block-Term Tensor Regression (FBTTR), an extension of BTTR designed for federated learning scenarios. FBTTR enables decentralized data analysis, allowing institutions to collaboratively build predictive models while preserving data privacy and complying with regulations. FBTTR represents a major step forward in applying tensor regression to federated learning environments. Its performance is evaluated in two case studies: finger movement decoding from Electrocorticography (ECoG) signals and heart disease prediction. In the first case study, using the BCI Competition IV dataset, FBTTR outperforms non-multilinear models, demonstrating superior accuracy in decoding finger movements. For the dataset, for subject 3, the thumb obtained a performance of 0.76 $\pm$ .05 compared to 0.71 $\pm$ 0.05 for centralised BTTR. In the second case study, FBTTR is applied to predict heart disease using real-world clinical datasets, outperforming both standard federated learning approaches and centralized BTTR models. In the Fed-Heart-Disease Dataset, an AUC-ROC was obtained of 0.872 $\pm$ 0.02 and an accuracy of 0.772 $\pm$ 0.02 compared to 0.812 $\pm$ 0.003 and 0.753 $\pm$ 0.007 for the centralized model.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。