用大模型分析万篇论文,发现AI与科学界脱节的真相
Bridging AI and Science: Implications from a Large-Scale Literature Analysis of AI4Science
- 用大语言模型从顶会论文中自动识别科学问题与AI方法
- 发现跨学科中AI方法与实际科学需求严重不匹配
- 提出链接预测框架,助力打通AI与科学合作壁垒
人工智能已证明是推动多学科科学进步的变革性工具,但其与科学界之间仍存在显著鸿沟,限制了其在广泛科学发现中的潜力。现有研究多依赖小规模文献的定性分析,难以全面反映AI4Science生态。本文通过大语言模型对顶级科学与人工智能会议论文进行大规模分析,构建新数据集,量化揭示了AI方法与科学问题之间的关键错配,凸显了跨学科深度整合的巨大机遇。同时,我们基于链接预测视角探索了促进两领域协作的可行性与挑战。研究成果与工具已在GitHub开源,旨在推动更具影响力的跨学科合作,加速科学发现进程。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Artificial Intelligence has proven to be a transformative tool for advancing scientific research across a wide range of disciplines. However, a significant gap still exists between AI and scientific communities, limiting the full potential of AI methods in driving broad scientific discovery. Existing efforts in identifying and bridging this gap have often relied on qualitative examination of small samples of literature, offering a limited perspective on the broader AI4Science landscape. In this work, we present a large-scale analysis of the AI4Science literature, starting by using large language models to identify scientific problems and AI methods in publications from top science and AI venues. Leveraging this new dataset, we quantitatively highlight key disparities between AI methods and scientific problems, revealing substantial opportunities for deeper AI integration across scientific disciplines. Furthermore, we explore the potential and challenges of facilitating collaboration between AI and scientific communities through the lens of link prediction. Our findings and tools aim to promote more impactful interdisciplinary collaborations and accelerate scientific discovery through deeper and broader AI integration. Our code and dataset are available at: https://github.com/charles-pyj/Bridging-AI-and-Science.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。