arXiv:2412.10424cs.CLcs.AI2024-12ACL被引 19

用对话式提问评估大模型,更真实反映其思维能力。

LLM-as-an-Interviewer: Beyond Static Testing Through Dynamic LLM Evaluation

  • 让大模型当面试官,通过多轮问答动态测试另一模型。
  • 能发现模型对反馈的适应力和后续追问的处理能力。
  • 适合想深入了解模型实际表现的研究者与开发者。

我们提出 LLM-as-an-Interviewer,一种全新的大语言模型评估范式。该方法通过多轮交互,由被评估的 LLM 面试官主动提供反馈并提出追问问题。初始阶段,面试官动态生成题目以避免数据污染。我们在 MATH 与 DepthQA 任务上评估了六种模型。结果表明,该框架能有效揭示模型在初始回答质量、反馈适应性以及应对澄清或知识补充类追问等方面的表现。相比传统方法如 LLM-as-a-Judge,该框架缓解了冗长倾向和运行不一致的问题。我们还提出了“面试报告”,整合对话过程中的实例与分析,全面展示模型优劣,提供真实应用场景下的性能快照。代码已公开于 https://github.com/interview-eval/。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

We introduce LLM-as-an-Interviewer, a novel paradigm for evaluating large language models (LLMs). This approach leverages multi-turn interactions where the LLM interviewer actively provides feedback on responses and poses follow-up questions to the evaluated LLM. At the start of the interview, the LLM interviewer dynamically modifies datasets to generate initial questions, mitigating data contamination. We apply the LLM-as-an-Interviewer framework to evaluate six models on the MATH and DepthQA tasks. Our results show that the framework effectively provides insights into LLM performance, including the quality of initial responses, adaptability to feedback, and ability to address follow-up queries like clarification or additional knowledge requests. The framework also addresses key limitations of conventional methods like LLM-as-a-Judge, including verbosity bias and inconsistency across runs. Finally, we propose the Interview Report, which aggregates insights from the interview process, providing examples and a comprehensive analysis of the LLM's strengths and weaknesses. This report offers a detailed snapshot of the model's real-world applicability. The code for our framework is publicly available at https://github.com/interview-eval/.

模型评估对话测试LLM行为分析

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。