arXiv:2412.11060cs.CVcs.LG2024-12NeurIPS被引 1

提出新指标DPA,能精准衡量分类数据集中的偏见放大方向与程度。

DPA: A one-stop metric to measure bias amplification in classification datasets

  • 基于可预测性设计,可判断模型是否加剧或减弱偏见。
  • 在平衡与非平衡数据上均有效,且能识别正负向偏见放大。
  • 比现有方法更稳定、结果有界,适合研究者统一评估偏见问题。

当前多数机器学习数据集包含偏见,模型训练时不仅会学习这些偏见,还可能加剧它们,即偏见放大现象。已有基于共现的度量方法虽可分析偏见放大方向,但存在局限:部分无法检测平衡数据中的偏见放大,另一些则无法识别负向偏见放大。近期提出的泄漏放大(LA)是基于可预测性的方法,但无法判断放大方向。为此,本文提出方向性可预测性放大(Directional Predictability Amplification, DPA),具备三个优势:(1) 能判断偏见放大的方向;(2) 适用于平衡与非平衡数据集;(3) 可准确识别正负偏见放大。DPA无需使用多个指标验证上述特性。相较于其他可预测性度量如LA,DPA对攻击函数选择不敏感,分数有界,并通过测量相对可预测性变化来考虑数据原始偏见。在COMPAS(表格数据)、COCO和ImSitu(图像数据)等知名数据集上的实验表明,DPA是分类任务中衡量偏见放大的最可靠指标。为便于对比,作者开源了主流偏见放大度量的一站式库:https://github.com/kerner-lab/Bias-Amplification。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

Most ML datasets today contain biases. When we train models on these datasets, they often not only learn these biases but can worsen them -- a phenomenon known as bias amplification. Several co-occurrence-based metrics have been proposed to measure bias amplification in classification datasets. They measure bias amplification between a protected attribute (e.g., gender) and a task (e.g., cooking). These metrics also support fine-grained bias analysis by identifying the direction in which a model amplifies biases. However, co-occurrence-based metrics have limitations -- some fail to measure bias amplification in balanced datasets, while others fail to measure negative bias amplification. To solve these issues, recent work proposed a predictability-based metric called leakage amplification (LA). However, LA cannot identify the direction in which a model amplifies biases. We propose Directional Predictability Amplification (DPA), a predictability-based metric that is (1) directional, (2) works with balanced and unbalanced datasets, and (3) correctly identifies positive and negative bias amplification. DPA eliminates the need to evaluate models on multiple metrics to verify these three aspects. DPA also improves over prior predictability-based metrics like LA: it is less sensitive to the choice of attacker function (a hyperparameter in predictability-based metrics), reports scores within a bounded range, and accounts for dataset bias by measuring relative changes in predictability. Our experiments on well-known datasets like COMPAS (a tabular dataset), COCO, and ImSitu (image datasets) show that DPA is the most reliable metric to measure bias amplification in classification problems. To compare DPA with existing bias amplification metrics, we released a one-stop library of major bias amplification metrics at https://github.com/kerner-lab/Bias-Amplification.

偏见检测公平性度量方法

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。