用少量目标数据提升植物病害诊断模型跨环境准确性
Few-shot Metric Domain Adaptation: Practical Learning Strategies for an Automated Plant Disease Diagnosis
- 通过最小化源域与目标域特征空间距离来减少域间差异
- 仅用每病10张目标图像,F1得分提升11.1至29.3点
- 适配性强、计算高效,适合实际农业场景部署
大量研究已实现基于图像的自动化植物病害诊断系统,展现出优异的诊断能力。然而,大规模分析揭示其在不同拍摄环境(域)下验证时性能显著下降。这一局限源于数据集规模有限、病害症状表现多样,以及栽培环境和成像条件(如设备、光照)差异大,导致训练数据多样性不足,限制了系统的鲁棒性与泛化能力。为此,本文提出少样本度量域适应(FMDA),一种灵活高效的改进方法,可在仅有少量目标域数据时提升诊断精度。FMDA通过约束诊断模型,使源域(训练)与目标域数据的特征空间“距离”最小化。该方法计算高效,仅需基础特征距离计算与反向传播,可无缝集成至任意机器学习流程。大规模实验涵盖20个田地、3种作物的223,015张叶片图像,使用每病仅10张目标域图像,FMDA相比无目标数据情形的F1得分提升11.1至29.3点;且相较使用相同数据的微调方法,平均提升8.5点。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Numerous studies have explored image-based automated systems for plant disease diagnosis, demonstrating impressive diagnostic capabilities. However, recent large-scale analyses have revealed a critical limitation: that the diagnostic capability suffers significantly when validated on images captured in environments (domains) differing from those used during training. This shortfall stems from the inherently limited dataset size and the diverse manifestation of disease symptoms, combined with substantial variations in cultivation environments and imaging conditions, such as equipment and composition. These factors lead to insufficient variety in training data, ultimately constraining the system's robustness and generalization. To address these challenges, we propose Few-shot Metric Domain Adaptation (FMDA), a flexible and effective approach for enhancing diagnostic accuracy in practical systems, even when only limited target data is available. FMDA reduces domain discrepancies by introducing a constraint to the diagnostic model that minimizes the "distance" between feature spaces of source (training) data and target data with limited samples. FMDA is computationally efficient, requiring only basic feature distance calculations and backpropagation, and can be seamlessly integrated into any machine learning (ML) pipeline. In large-scale experiments, involving 223,015 leaf images across 20 fields and 3 crop species, FMDA achieved F1 score improvements of 11.1 to 29.3 points compared to cases without target data, using only 10 images per disease from the target domain. Moreover, FMDA consistently outperformed fine-tuning methods utilizing the same data, with an average improvement of 8.5 points.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。