arXiv:2501.01367cs.ROcs.AI2025-01中稿 · HRI 2025被引 9

用用户探索行为自动学习机器人动作特征,提升偏好获取效率。

Contrastive Learning from Exploratory Actions: Leveraging Natural Interactions for Preference Elicitation

  • 通过用户探索动作构建对比学习框架,自动提取有意义的动作特征。
  • 在4个评估指标上优于自监督方法,显著提升偏好识别效果。
  • 适合人机交互、机器人个性化定制等需要高效偏好学习的场景。

人们对于机器人的行为有不同的偏好。为理解并推理这些偏好,机器人需学习一个描述其行为与用户偏好对齐程度的奖励函数。良好的行为表征可大幅减少用户教学所需时间和精力。然而,如何定义行为的关键特征仍是一大难题:从原始数据中学习的特征缺乏语义,而基于用户标注的数据则需繁琐的标签工作。本文的核心洞察是,用户在定制机器人时会自然产生探索性动作——他们主动尝试感兴趣的行动,忽略无关行为。为此,我们提出对比学习从探索动作(CLEA),利用这种自然生成的数据学习与用户关注特征对齐的轨迹特征。我们在25名用户与Kuri机器人进行开放式信号设计任务中收集探索动作,训练CLEA特征,并在另一项包含42名用户的实验中评估其性能。结果表明,在完整性、简洁性、最小性和可解释性四个指标上,CLEA特征均优于自监督基线方法。

原文摘要 · Abstract (English)

People have a variety of preferences for how robots behave. To understand and reason about these preferences, robots aim to learn a reward function that describes how aligned robot behaviors are with a user's preferences. Good representations of a robot's behavior can significantly reduce the time and effort required for a user to teach the robot their preferences. Specifying these representations -- what "features" of the robot's behavior matter to users -- remains a difficult problem; Features learned from raw data lack semantic meaning and features learned from user data require users to engage in tedious labeling processes. Our key insight is that users tasked with customizing a robot are intrinsically motivated to produce labels through exploratory search; they explore behaviors that they find interesting and ignore behaviors that are irrelevant. To harness this novel data source of exploratory actions, we propose contrastive learning from exploratory actions (CLEA) to learn trajectory features that are aligned with features that users care about. We learned CLEA features from exploratory actions users performed in an open-ended signal design activity (N=25) with a Kuri robot, and evaluated CLEA features through a second user study with a different set of users (N=42). CLEA features outperformed self-supervised features when eliciting user preferences over four metrics: completeness, simplicity, minimality, and explainability.

人机交互偏好学习对比学习

Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。