Certainty Equivalent 无需非退化条件仍能近优求解在线线性规划。
Beyond Non-Degeneracy: Revisiting Certainty Equivalent Heuristic for Online Linear Programming
- 在弱分布假设下分析 CE 性能,无需流体正则性条件。
- 首次证明 CE 保持接近最优后悔界,仅依赖对数平方至根号 T 的复杂度。
- 适用于连续条件收益分布的广泛场景,尤其适合动态资源分配研究者。
Certainty Equivalent (CE) 是运筹学与运营管理中广泛应用的动态资源分配算法。尽管其流行,现有理论保证局限于满足严格流体正则性条件(尤其是非退化条件)的情形,普遍认为违反这些条件会导致性能下降,需超越 CE 的新算法。本文在在线线性规划的通用框架下,对 CE 进行精细性能分析,表明其在仅需对底层分布施加温和假设的情况下,即可实现统一的近最优后悔界(至多含关于 $T$ 的多项式对数因子),无需依赖任何流体正则性条件。结果表明,与以往认知相反,CE 在多数具有连续条件收益分布的问题实例中,有效克服了退化困境,凸显离散与非离散设定间的关键结构差异。我们的显式后悔界通过参数 $β$ 插值于 $(\log T)^2$ 的温和情形与最坏情况 $\sqrt{T}$ 之间,推广了多秘书问题中的已有结论。为达成此成果,我们发展了新颖的算法分析技术:结合经验过程理论工具,建立了随机线性规划解的强集中性分析,使后悔分析在显著放松的假设下得以实现。这些技术或可应用于更广泛的在线决策场景。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
The Certainty Equivalent heuristic (CE) is a widely-used algorithm for various dynamic resource allocation problems in OR and OM. Despite its popularity, existing theoretical guarantees of CE are limited to settings satisfying restrictive fluid regularity conditions, particularly, the non-degeneracy conditions, under the widely held belief that the violation of such conditions leads to performance deterioration and necessitates algorithmic innovation beyond CE. In this work, we conduct a refined performance analysis of CE within the general framework of online linear programming. We show that CE achieves uniformly near-optimal regret (up to a polylogarithmic factor in $T$) under only mild assumptions on the underlying distribution, without relying on any fluid regularity conditions. Our result implies that, contrary to prior belief, CE effectively beats the curse of degeneracy for a wide range of problem instances with continuous conditional reward distributions, highlighting the distinction of the problem's structure between discrete and non-discrete settings. Our explicit regret bound interpolates between the mild $(\log T)^2$ regime and the worst-case $\sqrt{T}$ regime with a parameter $β$ quantifying the minimal rate of probability accumulation of the conditional reward distributions, generalizing prior findings in the multisecretary setting. To achieve these results, we develop novel algorithmic analytical techniques. Drawing tools from the empirical processes theory, we establish strong concentration analysis of the solutions to random linear programs, leading to improved regret analysis under significantly relaxed assumptions. These techniques may find potential applications in broader online decision-making contexts.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。