综述机器学习在考古学中的应用现状与方法规范
Machine learning applications in archaeological practices: a review
- 系统分析135篇考古领域机器学习论文,梳理任务分布与模型偏好
- 2019年后论文数量显著增长,神经网络与集成学习占三分之二
- 提出考古研究专用的机器学习方法流程指南,提升研究可复现性
近年来,人工智能与机器学习在考古学中的应用显著增加,覆盖所有子领域、地理区域和时间范围。本研究系统审查了1997至2022年间发表的135篇文献,发现2019年后论文数量明显上升。自动结构识别与文物分类是主要任务,其次是埋藏学与考古预测建模。相比监督学习,聚类与无监督方法使用较少。人工神经网络与集成学习占所有模型的三分之二。尽管机器学习日益流行,但部分研究存在方法要求不明确、局限性未说明、目标表达不清等问题。为此,本文提出一套适用于考古研究问题、项目规模与数据特点的方法流程指南。机器学习虽能高效处理大规模多变量数据,但仍需清晰的方法论与协作实践以释放其潜力。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Artificial intelligence and machine learning applications in archaeology have increased significantly in recent years, and these now span all subfields, geographical regions, and time periods. The prevalence and success of these applications have remained largely unexamined, as recent reviews on the use of machine learning in archaeology have only focused only on specific subfields of archaeology. Our review examined an exhaustive corpus of 135 articles published between 1997 and 2022. We observed a significant increase in the number of publications from 2019 onwards. Automatic structure detection and artefact classification were the most represented tasks in the articles reviewed, followed by taphonomy, and archaeological predictive modelling. From the review, clustering and unsupervised methods were underrepresented compared to supervised models. Artificial neural networks and ensemble learning account for two thirds of the total number of models used. However, if machine learning models are gaining in popularity they remain subject to misunderstanding. We observed, in some cases, poorly defined requirements and caveats of the machine learning methods used. Furthermore, the goals and the needs of machine learning applications for archaeological purposes are in some cases unclear or poorly expressed. To address this, we proposed a workflow guide for archaeologists to develop coherent and consistent methodologies adapted to their research questions, project scale and data. As in many other areas, machine learning is rapidly becoming an important tool in archaeological research and practice, useful for the analyses of large and multivariate data, although not without limitations. This review highlights the importance of well-defined and well-reported structured methodologies and collaborative practices to maximise the potential of applications of machine learning methods in archaeology.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。