发现多模态大模型视觉对应能力存在系统性缺陷,提出新基准和模型提升匹配精度
Are They the Same? Exploring Visual Correspondence Shortcomings of Multimodal LLMs
- 构建首个多模态视觉匹配基准MMVM,涵盖8类视觉对应任务
- 自研22万条带推理标注的训练数据,支持模型持续优化
- 提出CoLVA模型,比GPT-4o高7.15%准确率,适合视觉对齐研究者使用
尽管多模态大语言模型(MLLM)在视觉感知与跨模态理解方面表现强劲,但其视觉对应能力尚未得到充分研究。本文揭示当前主流模型如GPT-4o仍存在系统性不足。为此,我们构建了首个多模态视觉匹配基准MMVM,基于15个开源数据集与网络视频,经人工标注,涵盖8类视觉对应任务。同时设计自动化标注流程,生成包含22万条样本的MMVM SFT数据集,含推理标注。提出新型对比式MLLM CoLVA,采用细粒度视觉专家与指令增强策略,分别实现实例级特征区分与指令遵循能力提升。CoLVA-InternVL2-4B在MMVM上达到49.80%整体准确率,显著优于GPT-4o(42.65%)与最优开源模型Qwen2VL-72B(38.08%)。代码、基准、数据集与模型将公开。
原文摘要 · Abstract (English)
Recent advancements in multimodal large language models (MLLM) have shown a strong ability in visual perception, reasoning abilities, and vision-language understanding. However, the visual matching ability of MLLMs is rarely studied, despite finding the visual correspondence of objects is essential in computer vision. Our research reveals that the matching capabilities in recent MLLMs still exhibit systematic shortcomings, even with current strong MLLMs models, GPT-4o. In particular, we construct a Multimodal Visual Matching (MMVM) benchmark to fairly benchmark over 30 different MLLMs. The MMVM benchmark is built from 15 open-source datasets and Internet videos with manual annotation. We categorize the data samples of MMVM benchmark into eight aspects based on the required cues and capabilities to more comprehensively evaluate and analyze current MLLMs. In addition, we have designed an automatic annotation pipeline to generate the MMVM SFT dataset, including 220K visual matching data with reasoning annotation. To our knowledge, this is the first visual corresponding dataset and benchmark for the MLLM community. Finally, we present CoLVA, a novel contrastive MLLM with two novel technical designs: fine-grained vision expert with object-level contrastive learning and instruction augmentation strategy. The former learns instance discriminative tokens, while the latter further improves instruction following ability. CoLVA-InternVL2-4B achieves an overall accuracy (OA) of 49.80\% on the MMVM benchmark, surpassing GPT-4o and the best open-source MLLM, Qwen2VL-72B, by 7.15\% and 11.72\% OA, respectively. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of our MMVM SFT dataset and our novel technical designs. Code, benchmark, dataset, and models will be released.
Thank you to arXiv for use of its open access interoperability. PaperDance 不是 arXiv 官方产品;中文卡片由大模型生成,请以原文为准。